DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 1 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 R S T U V W X Y Z R Rabi,B., Tabatabaee, S.A., & Attarzadeh, M. –(2017). The effect of dynamic versus non-dynamic assessment on the use of resultive conjunctions in cause effect paragraph pattern. Modern Journal of Language Teaching. Rahbardar, H., Ajilian Abbasi, M., & Talaei, A. (2014). Dynamic Assessment (DA) and Evaluation of Problem-solving Skills in Children. International Journal of Pediatrics, 2(3.3), 47- 54. Rahmani, A. (2015). Dynamic assessment: A humanistic approach of learners’ writing proficiency from a Vygotskian perspective. Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science Science Journal (CSJ), 36(3), Special Issue, 960-967. Rahimi, M., Kushki, A., & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(2). Ram, G., Marinellie, S.A.,Benigno, J., & McCarthy, J. (2012). Morphological Analysis in Context vs Isolation: Use of a Dynamic Task with School Age Children. Lang Speech & Hearing Services in the School, 44, 32-47. Ram, G., Marinellie, S. A., Benigno, J., & McCarthy, J. (2013). Morphological analysis in context versus isolation: Use of a dynamic assessment task with school-age children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(1), 32-47. Ramazanpour, G., Nourdad, N., & Nouri, N. (2016). Gender differences in the effect of dynamic assessment on grammatical accuracy of writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(1), 90. Ramey, C.T. & MacPhee, D. (2006). A new paradigm in intellectual assessment? PsychCRITIQUES. Rand, Y. & Kaniel, S. (1987). Group administration of the LPAD. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 196-214). New York: Guilford. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 2 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Raykov, T., Baltes, M.,Neher, K., & Sowarka, D. (2002). A comparative study of two psychometric approaches to detect risk status for dementia. Gerontology, 48, 185-193. Razavi, A. (2015). The effect of dynamic assessment on the acquisition of apology speech act. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Razavi, A. & Tabatabaei, O. (2014). The effect of dynamic and nondynamic assessment on acquisition of apology speech act among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies (Special Issue on Applied Sciences), 4(8), 1-20. Available online@www.academians.org Razemba, F., L. Jacobs, et al. (2013). Convergent Validity of the Occupational Therapy Adult Perceptual Screening Test with two other cognitive- perceptual tests in South Africa. Occupational Therapy Africa Regional Group. Harare, Zimbabwe. Razzaq, L., Feng, M., Nuzzo-Jones, G., Hefferman, K., Koldinger, K., Junker, B., Ritter, S., Knight, A., Mercado, E., Turner, T.E., Upalekar, R., Walonoski, J.A., Macasek, M.A., Aniszczyk, C., Choksey, S., Livak, T., & Rasmussen, K. (2005). Blending assessment and instructional assisting. In C.K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredewig, & J.B. Bruker (Eds.) Proceedings of the 12th Artificial Intelligence In Education [Conference], 555-562. Amsterdam: ISO Press. http://www.assistment.org/portal/project/papers/AIED2005/ mainAIED.pdf Rea-Dickins, Pauline; Poehner, Matthew E. Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol 18(2), May 2011, 95-97. Rea-Dickins, P. & Poehner, M. (2011). Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (2), 95-99. Rea-Dickins, P. & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 95- 97. Reder, L.M. & Schunn, C.D. (1999).Bringing together the psychometric and strategy worlds: Predicting adaptivity in a dynamic task. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.). Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. Attention and performance (pp. 315-342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Rees, R.J. & Storry, C.J. (1996). Static and dynamic assessment practices after head injury. Brain Injury, 10(4), 247-257. Regalla, M. & Peker H. (2017). Dynamic assessment of special needs and typical students in a prekindergarten inclusive French program: Prompting all students to learn: Examining Dynamic Assessment. Foreign Language Annals (April), DOI: 10.1111/flan.12261 DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 3 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Reka, J., Edit, M., Zsuzsanna, F., & Eniko, B. (2013). Does cognitive-mediational intervention enhance inclusive education? Preliminary results from the work In the Feuerstein Centre in Cluj-Napoca. Transylvanian Journal of Psychology, Special Issue, 293. Rempfer, M., Hamera, E., Brown, C. & Bothwell, R.J.(2006). Learning proficiency on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in people with serious mental illnesses: What are the cognitive characteristics of good learners? Schizophrenia Research, 87, 316-322. Reschly, D.J. & Robinson-Zañartu, C. (2000). Aptitude tests in educational classification and placement. In G. Goldstein & M. Hersen. Handbook of psychological assessment (3rd edition) (pp. 183-201). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Resing, W. C., Touw, K. W., Veerbeek, J., & Elliott, J. G. (2017). Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: a study employing dynamic testing. Educational Psychology, 37(2), 173-191. Resing, W.C.M. (1990). Intelligentie en leerpotentieel. Een onderzoek naar het leerpotentieel van jonge leerlingen uit het basis-en speciaal onderwijs. [Intelligence and learning potential. A study on the learning potential of young children from primary schools and special education]. Academisch proefschrift. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 1-239). Resing, W.C.M. (1991). Leerpotentieel en de predictie van school prestaties. [Learning potential and the prediction of school success.] In B.H.A.M. van Hout-Woleters & L.F.W. de Klerk (Eds.). Onderwijsleerprocessen. Cognitie en motivatie. Amsterdam: SCO (pp. 163-172). Resing, W.C.M. (1993a). Measuring inductive reasoning skills: The construction of a learning potential test. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment. Theoretical, methodological and practical issues. Amsterdam/Berwyn P.A.: Swets & Zeitlinger Inc. (p. 219-241). Resing, W.C.M (1993b). Leerpotentieelonderzoek: een bijdrage aan de diagnostiek van jonge kinderen met leesproblemen. [Research on learning potential: A contribution to the diagnostic process for young children with reading problems]. In E.J.M. van Aarle & K. Henneman. Dyslexie '92. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 39-51). Resing, W.C.M. (1993c). Leerpotentieel en intelligentie: twee zijden van een medaille? [Learning potential and intelligence: Two sides of the same coin?] In E.H. Rodigas & C.E.H.E. Veraart (Eds.). Zorgbreedte. Heerlen: OBC/CRO/PABO (pp. 30-38). Resing, W.C.M. (1995a). Niet wat je weet, maar wat je kunt leren. [Not what you know, but what you can learn]. Psychologie, 14, juli/auagustus, 37-39. Resing, W.C.M. (1995b). Leerpotentieelonderzoek in het special onderwijs: een aanvulling op het onderzoek met de RAKIT. {Learning potential research in special education: New data with the RAKIT]. In Nieuwe ontwikkelingen in de psychodiagnostiek (pp. 81-103). Jubileumuitgave DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 4 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 van de Vereniging voor Psychodiagnostisch Werkenden, Oktober, 1995. Rijswijk: RS Drukkerij. Resing, W.C.M. (1996). Untersuchung zur Lernfahigkeit bei Kindern: Die Auswirkungen eines metakognitiven induktiven Denktrainings. [Research on learning potential in children: The effect of metacognitive training in inductive thinking]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Padagogische Psychologie, 28 Heft 1, 33-53. Resing, W.C.M. (1997a). Learning potential assessment: the alternative for measuring intelligence? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 68 – 82. Resing, W.C.M. (1997b). Intelligentie, leren en leerpotentieel. Meer van hetzelfde? [Intelligence, learning and learning potential. Are they all the same?] In W. Tomic & H.van der Molen (Eds.). Intelligentie en sociale competentie. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 301-323). Resing, W.C.M. (1997c). Leerpotentieel onderzoek: wat is de meerwaarde? [Assessing learning potential: Does it have a surplus value?] In T. Engelen-Snaterse & R. Kohnstamm (Eds.). Kinder- en Jeugdpsychologie. Trends. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 283-303). Resing, W.C.M. (1998). Intelligence and learning potential: Theoretical and research issues. In J. Kingma & W. Tomic (Eds.), Conceptual issues in research on intelligence. Vol.5 of Advances in cognition and educational practice (series editor: J.S. Carlson). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI Press. (227 - 259). Resing, W.C.M. (2000). Assessing the learning potential for inductive reasoning in young children. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications, Vol. 6 (pp. 229-262). Advances in cognition and educational practice (series editor: J.S. Carlson). Oxford: Elsevier Inc. Resing, W.C.M. (2001). Beyond Binet: All testing should be dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 221-231. Resing, W.C.M. (2006). Using children's 'ability to learn' in diagnosis and assessment. Educational & Child Psychology, 23(3), 6-11. Resing, W.C.M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95. Resing, W.C.M. (Ed.). (2015). Handboek intelligentiemeting en testgebruik. Amsterdam, Pearson. Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Intelligentiemeting: theorie en psychologische modelvorming. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.19-40). Amsterdam, Pearson Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Praktische aspecten van intelligentiemeting: afname, scoring en interpretatie. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.41-62). Amsterdam, Pearson. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 5 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Tot slot. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.397-401). Amsterdam, Pearson. Resing, W.C.M., Bakker, M., Pronk, C.M.E. & Elliott, J.G. (2016). Dynamic testing and transfer: An examination of children’s problem-solving strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 110-119. Resing, W.C.M., Bakker, M., Pronk, C.M.E., & Elliott, J.G. (2017). Progression paths in children’s problem solving: The influence of dynamic testing, initial variability, and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153. DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.004 Resing, W.C.M., deJong, F.M., Bosma, T., & Tunteler, E. (2009). Learning during dynamic testing: Variability in strategy use by indigenous and ethnic minority children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(1), 22-37. Resing, W. C. M. and Elliott, J. G. (2011), Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: Measuring children's change in strategy use with a series completion task. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(4). 579-605. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002006 Resing, W.C.M., Elliott, J.G., & Grigorenko, E.L. (in press). Dynamic testing & assessment. In: S. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, Springer Verlag. Resing, W.C.M., & Bleichrodt, N. (2015). WNV: Non-verbale intelligentiemeting voor een brede leeftijdsrange. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.225- 247). Amsterdam, Pearson Resing, W.C.M., & Bleichrodt, N. (2015). RAKIT-2: Intelligentiemeting bij kinderen in de basisschoolleeftijd. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.141-167). Amsterdam, Pearson. Resing, W.C.M. & Drenth, P.J.D. (2007). Intelligentie: Weten en meten [Intelligence: Knowing and measuring]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds. Resing, W.C.M. & Hessels, M.G.P. (2001). Het meten van de cognitieve mogelijkheden en het schoolgedrag van allochtone leerlingen. [Measuring the cognitive potential and the school behavior of ethnic minority children]. In N. Bleichrodt & F. Van de Vijver (Eds.). Diagnostiek voor allochtonen. Mogelikheden en beperkingen van psychologische tests. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger (pp. 89-118). Resing, W.C.M., & Hessels, M.G.P. (2000, in press). The assessment of cognitive abilities of minority children [Het testen van cognitieve vaardigheden bij allochtone kinderen]. In N. Bleichrodt & F.J.R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Het gebruik van psychologische tests bij allochtonen: problemen en remedies. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Haarlem: De Vrieseborch Resing, W.C.M. & Roth-Van der Werf, G.J.M. (2001). Inductive reasoning: The relationship between learning potential assessment and cognitive training. In F. Oser & U. Baetz (Eds.). Bridging the gap between learning and instruction. Abstracts of the 9th European Conferene on Learning and Instruction, Pp. 259-260. Aachen, Mainz. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 6 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Resing, W.C.M., & Roth-Van der Werf, G.J.M. (2002). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training in inductive reasoning: emergent relationship? In: G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice Volume 7. Learning Potential Assessment and Cognitive Training (p.175-208). New York: Elsevier Science Ltd. Resing, W.C.M., & Roth-Van der Werf, G.J.M. (2003/ in press). The emperor’s new clothes: Testing the theory behind a cognitive training program. Educational and Child Psychology. Resing, W.C.M., Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M., & Bosma, T. (2002). Dynamic assessment: using measures for learning potential in the diagnostic process. In: G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice Volume 7. Learning Potential Assessment and Cognitive Training (p.29-64. New York: Elsevier Science Ltd. Resing, W.C.M., Stevenson, C.E., and Bosma, T. (2012). Dynamic testing: Measuring inductive reasoning in children with developmental disabilities and mild cognitive impairments. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(2), 159-178. Resing, W.C.M., Touw, K.W.J., Veerbeek, J., & Elliott, J.G. (2016) Progress in the inductive strategy-use of children from different ethnic backgrounds: A study employing dynamic testing. Educational Psychology (April). DOI:10.1080/01443410.2016.1164300 Resing, W. C.M., Tunteler, E., & Elliott, J.G. (2015). The effect of dynamic testing with electronic prompts and scaffolds on Children’s Inductive Reasoning: A microgenetic study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14(2). Resing, W.C.M., Tunteler, E., Roig, I., Elliott, J.G., Van Herk, R., & Verhaegh, J. (in prep). Dynamically testing inductive reasoning abilities. The use of a tangible table in a learning-while- testing situation. Resing, W.C.M., Verhaegh, J., Hart de Ruiter, E., Tunteler, E., Fontijn, W., & Elliott, J.G. (in prep.). Dynamic testing while learning: The use of tangible tables and scaffolding techniques in education. Resing, W.C.M. & Wijk, A.M. van (1996). Leerpotentieel: onderzoek bij allochtone leerlingen uit het basisonderwijs. [Learning potential: Research with ethnic minority children from mainstream education]. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 35, 432-444. Rey, A. (1934). D'un procédé pour évaluer l'éducabilité: Quelques applications en psychopathologie (On a procedure for evaluating educability: Some applications in psychopathology). Archives de Psychologie, 24(96), 298-337. Rey, A. (1991). L'évaluation de l'éducabilité cognitive (le test des plateaux). Issy-les-Moulineaux: Editions Scientifiques et Psychotechniques. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 7 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Rezaee, A.A. & Ghanbarpour, M. (2016). The measurement paradigm and role of mediators in dynamic assessment: A qualitative meta-synthesis. International Journal of Language Studies . 10 (4), 77-108. Richards, T., Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Parsons, A., Field, K., & Richards, A. (2005). Brain activation during language task contrasts in children with and without dyslexia: Inferring mapping processes and assessing response to spelling instruction. Education and Child Psychology, 22(2), 62-80. Riley, K., Miller, G.E. & Sorenson, C. (2016). Early childhood authentic and performance-based assessment. In A. Garro (Ed.). Early childhood assessment in school and clinical child psychology (pp. 95-117). New York: Springer. 95-117. Rittner, L. L. ( 2010). The children's Inferential Thinking Modifiability Test as a tool for the identification of second grade gifted Hispanic learners. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 3758. Rittner, L. L. & Pulos, S.M. (2014). Rasch model of a dynamic assessment: An investigation of the Children’s Inferential Thinking Modifiability Test. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15(1), 40-52. Robaye, F. & Robaye, E. (1956). Détermination de la zone discriminative dans un test a item de difficulté croissante. Bulletin de Centre d'études de Recherches Psychotechinques, 2. Robinson, C.A. (1987a). The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD): Its role in the non- biased assessment of cognitive functioning. (Alternative Assessment Committee Report CASP). CASP Today, XXXVII, 3, 10-16. Robinson, C.A. (1987b). A rebuttal to Frisby. The LPAD back in perspective. CASP Today, XXXVII(2), 3-5. Robinson, C.A. (1987c). The Learning Potential Assessment Device: A non-biased assessment of cognitive functioning. An occasional paper. San Diego, CA: Policy Studies in Languages and Cross Cultural Education. Robinson, C.A. & Cook, V.J. (1990). Alternative assessment ecosystems and dynamic. NASP Communiqué, 18(5). Robinson-Zañartu, C. (1996). Serving Native American children and families: Considering cultural variables. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 27(4), 373-384. Robinson-Zañartu, C. (2011). Dynamic assessment: An intervention-based DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 8 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 approach. In S. Jackson, G. Brown, & R. Laro-Alecio (Eds.). Handbook of educational theories (pp. 787-793). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Robinson-Zañartu, C.A. & Aganza, J.S. (2000). Dynamic assessment and sociocultural context: Assessing the while child. In C.S. Lidz and J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 443-487. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier. Robinson-Zañartu, C. & Campbell, L. (2000). Developing scientific minds: The use of mediated thinking and learning to facilitate enhanced student outcomes. The California School Psychologist, 5, 33-42. Robinson-Zañartu, C. & Carlson, J. (2012). Dynamic assessment. In K.F. Geisinger, (Ed.). Handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (pp. 149-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Robinson-Zañartu, C, & Carlson, J. (2013). Dynamic assessment. In K.F. Geisinger, B.A. Bracken, J.F. Carlson, J-I. C., Hansen, N.R. Kuncel, S.P. Reise, & M.C. Rodriguez,(Eds), (2013). APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 3: Testing and assessment in school psychology and education. APA handbooks in psychology pp. 149-167). Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association. Robinson-Zañartu, C. & Reschly, D. (1997). Evaluacion de las aptitudes (Evaluation of aptitudes) in G. Buela-Casal (Ed.). Manual de evaluacion psicologica (Handbook of psychological evaluation). Madrid , España: Siglo XXI de Expaña. Rodger, S., Daley, E., Hughes, K.& Ziviani, J. (2005). Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment for Children: Perceived utility in Australian occupational therapy practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(4), 337-349. Robles, M.A. Y Calero, M.D. La Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje para la lectura en niños con síndrome Down. Siglo Cero, 2003, 34 (2)15-25. Robles-Bello, M. A. & Calero Garcia, M.D. (2013). Using learning potential to evaluate children with specific language impairment. The Spanish journal of psychology, 16(68), 1-11. Robles-Bello, M.A., Sanchez-Teruel, D., & Naranjo, N.V. (2015). Evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje en niños con trastorno específico del lenguaje . Revista de Psicologia Clinica con Niños y Adolescentes, 2(1), 19-24. Rodriguez-Arocho, W.C.(1989). La zona de desarrollo proximo y su importancia en la evaluacion de destrezas de pensamiento [The zone of proximal development and its importance in the evaluation of thinking skills]. In A. Villarini & A. Rios (Eds.), Ponencias del Primer Encuentro sobre la Investigacion y la Enseoanza Orientada al Desarrollo de Destrezas de Pensamiento (pp. 309-314). Universidad de Puerto Rico: Centro para el Fortalecimiento de la Docencia. Rosario, A.C., Candeias, A.A. & Cruz. V. (2011). Dynamic assessment & intervention of learning difficulties based on the PASS Reading Enhancement Programme. In J. Lebeer, A. Candeias, & L. Gracio (Eds.). With a different glance: Dynamic assessment of functioning of children DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 9 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 oriented at development and inclusive learning (pp.219- 226). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant- Uitgevers. Roth, W.-M. (1992). Dynamic and authentic assessment: An approach for assessing cognitive change and learning in authentic settings. Science Scope, 15(6), 37-40. Rothman, H.R.& Semmel, M.I. (1990). Dynamic assessment: A comprehensive review of literature. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.). Issues and research in special education, Volume 1. Teachers College Press Special Education Series (pp. 355-386). New York: Teachers College Press. Roth-van der Werf, G.J.M., Resing, W.C.M., & Slenders, A.P.A.C. (2002). Task similarity and transfer of an inductive reasoning training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 296-325. Roybal-Benson, C.W. (2007). Becoming phonemically aware: A study on the role of assistance in language learning. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68 (3-A), 933. Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M., Castelijns, J.H.M., & Hamers, J.H.M. (1993). The validity of learning potential tests. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 69-82). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Rumley, L. (2007). Etude de la validité prédictive d'un test d'apprentissage: Le HART [Study of the predictive validity of a learning test: The HART]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Geneva. Rutland, A. & Campbell, R. (1995). The validity of dynamic assessment methods for children with learning difficulties and nondisabled children. Journal of Cognitive Education, 5(1), 81-94. Rutland, A.F. & Campbell, R.N. (1996). Relevance of Vygotsky's teory of the 'zone of proximal development' to the assessment of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40(2), 151-158. Ryba, K. (1998). Dynamic assessment and programme planning for students with intellectual disabilities. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 27(2), 3-10. Ryder, M.G. (1994). An analysis of the effects of motivational components on performance during a dynamic assessment procedure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-08, section A,2356. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 10 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 S BACK TO TOP Sahbi, B.B. (2017). Validation of a Dynamic Reading Comprehension Test for EAP Learners in an EFL In Hidri & Coombe (Eds). Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa, Chapter 19, Springer International Publishing, pp. 315-337. DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 319-43234-2_19 Saber, K. M. (2015) Dynamic assessment: From theory to practice. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Sadeghi, K. & Khanahmadi, F. (2011). Dynamic assessment of EFL grammar: The role of mediated learning experience in L2 learning. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 931. Sadeghi, K. & Khonbi, Z. A. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 129-133. Sadek, N. (2011). Dynamic assessment and second language writing: Toward a hybrid dynamic assessment model in assessing English Language Learners (ELL). LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Saenz, T. I. & Huer, M.B. (2003). Testing strategies involving leasst biased language assessmentn of bilingual children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24(4), 184-193. Safa, M. A., & Jafari, F. (2017). The Washback Effect of Dynamic Assessment on Grammar Learning of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 55-68. Sahragard, R. & Heidari,K.(2014).How much mediation in dynamic assessment for gifted students? Up to critical thinking please! Gifted Education International. Sainsbury, E.J. & Walker, R.A. (2008). Assessment as a vehicle for learning: Extending collaboration into testing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 103-117. Sahragard, R. & Heidari, K. ( 2017). How much mediation in dynamic assessment for gifted students? Up to critical thinking please! Gifted Education International. Saldaña, D. ((2004). Dynamic Master Mind: Interactive use of a game for testing metacognition. School Psychology International, 25(4), 422-438. Samuels, M.T. (2000). Assessment of post-secondary students with learning difficulties: Using dynamic assessment in a problem-solving process. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 521-542). Amsterdam:JAI/Elsevier Science. Samuels, M. (2005). Guest editorial: Assessment of postsecondary students: Why we should be using dynamic assessment. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 5, 1, 17-24. www.iacep.coged.org DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 11 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Samuels, M., Lamb, C., & Oberholtzer, L. (1992). Dynamic assessment of adults with learning difficulties. In H.C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 275-299. New York: Springer-Verlag. San Miguel, C.L. (1977). Learning potential approaches to the mentally retarded. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38 (1-B), 378-379. Saniei, A., Birjandi, P., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2015). On the Practicality of Group Dynamic Assessment: A Seminal Enterprise Deserving Closer Scrutiny. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(2), 39-46. Sarani, A. & Izadi, M. (2016). Diagnosing L2 receptive vocabulary development: A microgenetic study. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 35(2), 161-189. Sarnio, P. (1994). A comparative study of dynamic and static testing in abstinent alcoholics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(2), 272-280. Sato, M. (2017). Oral peer corrective feedback. Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning: Research, Theory, Applications, Implications, 66. Savron, B.L. (1989). Modifying similarity thinking: Implications for the generalization of knowledge. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction, 1(1), 27-47. Sawaki, Y. (2017). The effects of different levels of performance feedback on TOEFL iBT® reading practice test performance. DOI 10.1002/ets2.12159, Educational Testing Service, TOEFL Committee of Examiners ETS Research Report Series. Schack, T. & Guthke, J. (2003). Dynamic testing. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(1), 40-60. Schardt, A., Whitten, C., & Gamlin, P.J. (1996). A walk in our moccasins: Applying dynamic approaches in a remote Native community. In M.G. Luther, E.Cole, et al. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 316-325). Schevel, E-M (2008). Adaption der "Application of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS) fur den deutschen Sprachraum [Adaptation of the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale {ACFS} for German speakers]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat Osnabruch, Germany. Schottke, H., Bartram, M., & Wiedl, K.H. (1993). Psychometric implications of learning potential assessment: A typological approach. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma & A.J.J.M. Ruissenaars (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues (pp. 153-173). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. Scissons, M.B.A. (1989). Dynamic assessment of learning potential of Indian adolescents in algebra. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Saskatchewan (Canada). Schlatter, C. (1994). Enseignement de la pensée inductive: une étude sur la variation des effets d'apprentissage selon le niveau d'explicité des aides. Mémoire de licence déposé à l'Université de DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 12 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Genève, FPSE, Section des Sciences de l'Education. Schlatter, C. (1999). Le Test d'Apprentissage de la Pensée Analogique. Fondation théorique et empirique d'un outil d'évaluation pour personnes présentant un retard mental modéré. Thèse de doctorat soutenue à l'Université de Genève, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education. Schlatter, C. (en préparation). Efficacité de différents niveaux d’aides pour l’entraînement au raisonnement inductif. In F.P. Büchel (Ed.), Pensée inductive et handicap mental. Lucerne: SZH. Schlatter, C. & Buechel, F.P. (2000). Detecting reasoning abilities of persons with moderate mental retardation: The Analogical Reasoning Learning Test (ARLT). In C.S.Lidz J.G.Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 155-186). Amsterdam:Elsevier Science. Schlatter, C., Büchel, F.P., & Thomas, L. (1997). Test d'apprentissage de la pensée analogique pour adolescents handicapés mentaux modérés. Revue Francophone de la Déficience Intellectuelle, 8(1), 37-54. Schloss, P.J., Smith, M.A., Hoover, T., & Wolford, J. (1987). Dynamic criterion-referenced vocational assessment: An alternative strategy for handicapped youth. Diagnostique, 12(2), 74- 86. Schneider, E. & Ganschow, L. (2000). Dynamic assessment and instructional strategies for learners who struggle to learn a foreign language. Dyslexia, 6 (1), 72-82. Schottke, H., Bartram, M. & Wiedl, K.H. (1993). Psychometric implications of dynamic assessment: A typological approach. In J. Hamers, A. Ruijssenaars, & K. Sijtsma (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues (pp. 153-174). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. Sclan, S.G. (1987). Dynamic assessment and thought disorder in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenic patients. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(7-B), 3126. Seabi, J. (2012). Feuerstein’s mediated learning experience as a vehicle for enhancing cognitive functioning of remedial school learners in South Africa. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 12, 35-45. Seethaler, P. M. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. & Compton, D. L. (2012). Predicting first graders' development of calculation versus word-problem performance: The role of dynamic assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1), 224-234. Seethaler, P.M., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. (2015). Does the value of dynamic assessment in predicting end-of-first grade mathematics performance differ as a function of English language proficiency? Elementary School Journal, 15(4), 289-308. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 13 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Seiverd, K.D. (1994). Dynamic assessment vs. traditional intelligence assessment in low- achieving minority and nonminority children. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 54(7-B), 3865. Selcuk Acar, Sedat Sen, and Nur Cayirdag. Consistency of the Performance and Nonperformance Methods in Gifted Identification: A Multilevel Meta-Analytic Review. Gifted Child Quarterly 0016986216634438, first published on February 26, 2016 doi:10.1177/0016986216634438 Seok-Hoon, A.S. (2001). Parental involvement in child assessment: A dynamic approach. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education International Conference (Fremantle,Western Australia; December 2-6). ED463876 Seok-Hoon Seng, A., Kwee-Hoon Pou, L., & Tan, O-S (Eds.) (2003). Mediated learning experience with children: Applications across contexts. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) [mghasia@mcgraw-hill.com] Serena, V.M. & Stefano, T. (no date). The concept of the zo-ped in the perspective of a concrete application: The evaluation of the obtained results. online: http://psych.hanover.edu/vygotsky/veggetti.html Sergi, M.J. Kern, R.S., Mintz, J. & Green, M.F. (2005). Learning potential and the prediction of work skill acquisition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 67-72. Sewell, T.E. (1987). Dynamic assessment as a nondiscriminatory procedure. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 426-443). New York: Guilford. Seyed Erfani, Sh. & Agha Ebrahimiyan, A. (2013). Web 2.0 incorporated dynamic assessment to assess writing ability of Iranian EFL learners. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 13(14), 49-55. Shabani, K. (2014). Dynamic Assessment of L2 Listening Comprehension in Transcendence Tasks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1729-1737. Shabani, K. & Malekdar, S. (2016) The effect of peer scaffolding on Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 49-65. Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers' Professional Development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237-248. Shakki, F, Derakhshan, A. & Ziabari, R.S. (2016). The interplay between language skills and dynamic assessment. DOI: 10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9221 DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 14 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Shakki, F., Derakhshan, A., & Ziabari, R.S. (2016). The interplay between language skills and dynamic assessment. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 141-157. Shaller, G. (2006). Teaching and tracking emergent literacy instruction in Head Start. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 67 (2-B), 1168. Shamir, A. & Lazerovitz, T. (2007). Peer mediation intervention for scaffolding self-regulated learning among children with learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(3), 255-273. Shamir, A., & Tzuriel, D. (in press). Children’s meditational teaching style as a function of intervention for cross-age peer-mediation. School Psychology International. Sharafi, M. & Sardareh, S. A. (2016). The effect of dynamic assessment on elementary EFL students’ L2 grammar learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(3), 102-120. Shaughnessy, M.F. (2004). An interview with Joe Elliott and Carol Lidz. North American Journal of Psychology, 6(2), 349-360. Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14. Shohamy, E. (2017). Critical language testing. Language Testing and Assessment, 1-15. Shrestha, P. (in progress). Dynamic assessment of academic writing among learners in open and distance education. Department of Languages Faculty of Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom. Shrestha, P. (2011). Dynamic assessment of academic writing for business studies. EdD Doctoral thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes. Shrestha, P. & Azim, F. (2014). International trends in English language assessment: Implications for Bangladesh. In: English Language Skills Assessment in the Primary and Secondary Education Sectors in Bangladesh Dhaka, Bangladesh. Shrestha, P. & Coffin, C. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 55–70. Shrestha, P.N. (2017). Investigating the learning transfer of genre features and conceptual knowledge from an academic literacy course to business studies: Exploring the potential of dynamic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 1-17. Shrestha, Prithvi (2011). Dynamic assessment of academic writing for business studies. Unpublished EdD thesis, The Open University, Milton Keynes. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 15 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Shrestha, Prithvi and Coffin, Caroline (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing, 17(1), pp. 55–70. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.11.003 Shu-Hsien, H., Ting-Ting, W., Hui-Chub, C. & Gwo-Jen, H. (2008). A decision tree approach to conducting dynamic assessment in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, (wmute 2008), pp. 89-94. Shurin, R. (1999). Concurrent and discriminant validity of a dynamic assessment procedure with special needs and typical preschool children. Master's thesis: Touro College, New York, NY. ED435681 Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1-19. Siekmann, S. & Charles, W. (2011). Upingakuneng (when they are ready): Dynamic Assessment in a third semester Yugtun class. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (2), 151-168. Sijtsma, K. (1993a). Psychometric issues in learning potential assessment. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 175-193). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Sijtsma, K. (1993b). Classical and modern test theory with an eye toward learning potental testing. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma et al. (Eds.). Learning potental assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 117-133). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Silverman, H. (1985). Dynamic cognitive assessment:An alternative to intelligence testing. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 1(1), 63-72. Singer, V.L.R. (2014). A dynamic assessment of single word learning in two year old late talkers. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Canterbury, Department of Communication Disorders, Science Times and Dissertations. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9924 Sittner Bridges, M., Catts, H.W. The use of a dynamic screening of phonological awareness to predict risk for reading disabilities in kindergarten children. J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul- Aug;44(4): 330-8. Skuy, M., Apter, A., Dembo, Y., Kaniel, S. & Tzuriel, D. (1992). Cognitive modifiability of adolescents with schizophrenia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 583-589. Skuy, M., Kaniel, S. & Tzuriel, D. (1988). Dynamic assessment of intellectually superior Israeli children in a low socio-economic status community. Gifted Education International, 5, 90-96. Skuy, M. & Shmukler, D. (1987). Effectiveness of the Learning Potential Assessment Device for Indian and "colored" South Africans. International Journal of Special Education, 2, 131-149. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 16 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Slenders, A.P.A.C. & Resing, W.C.M. (1994). Het leerpotentieel van allochtone moelijk lerende en basisschoolleerlingen. [The learning potential of ethnic minority children in primary education and in schools for children with severe learning difficulties]. In G. Kanselaar (Ed.). Onderwijsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Utrecht: Universiteit van Utrecht (pp. 64-66). Slenders, A.P.A.C. & Resing, W.C.M. (1997). Leerpotentieelonderzoek bij allochtone leerlingen: een eerst verkenning met de Leerpotentieeltest voor Inductief Redeneren. [Research on learning potential with children of ethnic minority groups: The Learning Potential Test for Inductive Reasoning]. Pedagogische Studien, 74, 183-196. Sloan, K.A. (1990). Task-relevant and task-irrelevant approaches to the assessment of learning potential. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(4-A), 1172. Smid, W., van Beek, D. & Wever, E. (2012). Plegers van seksuele delicten: Etiologie, assessment en interventies. / The etiology, assessment and treatment of sex offenders. Gedragstherapie, 45(2), 227-255. Smit, M. (2010). Educational psychologists’ views on the relevance of dynamic Assessment for their practice. Unpublished Masters of Educational Psychology Degree, Stellenbosch University. (downloadable from the internet). Snell, M.E. (2002). Early Reading First: Scaffolding early literacy. A Manual for The Dynamic Assessment of Nonsymbolic Communication Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia. Snell, M.E. (2002). Using dynamic assessment with learners who communicate nonsymbolically. AAC: Augmentive & Alternative Communication, 18(3), 163-176. Snell, M.E., & Loncke, F. (2002). A manual for the dynamic assessment of nonsymbolic communication. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia. Snow, R.E. (1990). Progress and propaganda in learning assessment. Contemporary Psychology, 35, 1134-1136. Soliman, A., Moghazy, M. & Elsayed, K. (2009). Metacognitive strategy training improves driving situation awareness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37 (9),1161-1170. Solovieva, Yu. & Quintanar, L. (2004). The usage of the zone pf proximal development during diagnosis of the development of intellectual activity. In S. Castañeda (Ed.), Education, learning and cognitition. Theory in the practice. (pp. 75–92). Mexico: Manual Moderno. Solovieva, Y. & Quintanar, L. (2016). The zone of proximal development during assessment of intellectual development in pre-school children. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 9(4). Son, G., & Kim, S. (2017). The Potentials of Dynamic Assessment for the Development of English Speaking Performance. 영어교과교육, 16, 47-82. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 17 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Sønnesyn, G. (2011). Dynamic assessment of learning within curricular subjects; mathematical knowledge. In J. Lebeer, A. Candeias, & L. Gracio (Eds.). With a different glance: Dynamic assessment of functioning of children oriented at development and inclusive learning (pp.206- 218). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant-Uitgevers. Spector, J.E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 353-363. Spector, J. M. (2016). The potential of smart technologies for learning and instruction. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1), 21-32. Speece, D.L. & Cooper, D.H. (1990). Ontogeny of school failure: Classification of first-grade children American Educational Research Journal, 27, 119-140. Speece, D.L., Cooper, D.H., & Kibler, J.M. Dynamaic assessment, individual differences, and academic achievement. Learning & Individual Differences, 2(1), 113-127. Spero, J. M. (2013). Comparison between a dynamic assessment procedure and the WMLS-R in distinguishing language abilities among Hispanic children in first grade. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 73(12-A(E)), No Pagination Specified. Stacey, G. (2017). A professional decision you have to make: a sociocultural exploration of practice and impact within educational psychologists’ use of dynamic assessment. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, College of Social Sciences, ID code 7412. Stad, F.E., Wiedl, K.H. & Resing, W.C.M. (2016). Dynamic testing of children’s series completion ability: Cognitive flexibility as a predictor of performance. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6(2), 143-. Stanfa, K. M. (2011). Differentiating among students: The value added of a dynamic assessment of morphological problem-solving. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72(5-A), 1616. Stanley, N.V. (1993). Gifted and the "zone of proximal development." Gifted Education International, 9(2), 78-81. Stanley, N.V. et al. (1995). Identification of gifted with the Dynamic Assessment Procedure (DAP). Gifted Education International, 10(2), 85-87. Steele, S C., Willoughby, L M., & Mills, M T. (2013). Learning word meanings during reading: Effects of phonological and semantic cues on children with language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology,15(2), 184-197. Sternberg, R.J. (2006). Dynamic assessment (Korean edition). Hak Jisa Publ. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 18 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002a). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge (UK): University of Cambridge. Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Birney, D.P., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., & Jeltova, I. (2007). Dynamic instruction for and assessment of developing expertise in four ethnic groups (RM07226). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut. Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., Ngorosho, D., Tantufuye,E., Mbise, A., Nokes, C., Jukes, M., & Bundy, D.A. (2002). Assessment intellectual potential in rural Tanzanian school children. Intelligence, 30(2), 141-162. Sternberg, R.S. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2001). All testing is dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7(2), 137-170. Stevens, G.P. (1993). Differential dynamic assessment of reading: An alternative to traditional reading assessment. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54 (6-A), 2106. Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children. (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij. Stevenson, C.E. (2016). Role of working memory and strategy-use in feedback effects on children’s progression in analogy solving: An explanatory item response theory account. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-26. Stevenson, C.E., Bergwerff, C.E., Heiser, W.J. & Resing, W.C.M. (2014). Working memory and dynamic measures of analogical reasoning as predictors of children’s math and reading achievement. Infant and Child Development, 23(1), 51-66. Stevenson, C. E.; Heiser, W. J.; Resing, W. C. M. (2016a). Dynamic testing: Assessing cognitive potential of children with culturally diverse backgrounds. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 27-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.025 Stevenson, C.E., Heiser, W., & Resing, W.C.M. (2016b). Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in 5- to 6-year-olds: Multiple-choice versus constructed-response training items. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (January). Stevenson, C.E., Hickendorff, M., Resing, W.C.M., Heiser, W.J. & de Boeck, P.A.L. (2013). Explanatory item response modeling of children’s change on a dynamic test of analogical reasoning. Intelligence, 41(3), 157-168. Stevenson, C. E., Touw, K. W. J., & Resing, W.C.M. (in press). Computer or Paper Analogy Puzzles: Does Assessment Mode Influence Young Children’s Strategy Progression? Educational and Child Psychology, 28, special issue. Stevenson, C.E., Hickendorff, M., Resing, W.C.M., Heiser, W.J. & De Boeck, P.A.L. (2013). Explanatory item response modeling of children’s change on a dynamic test of analogical DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 19 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 reasoning. Intelligence, 41, 157-168. 
 Stoffers, L.M., Hamers, J.H.M., Hessels, M.G.P., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (1989). Third Interim report of the project Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities Derde Interimverslag van het project Leertest voor etnische Minderheden]. Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht. Storch, N. (2017). Sociocultural Theory in the L2 Classroom. The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 69. Stott, D.H. (1987). Relating learning styles to learning capability. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 215-236). New York: Guilford. Strand, E. (2017). Appraising Apraxia: When a speech-sound disorder is severe, how do you know if it’s childhood apraxia of speech? The ASHA Leader, 22(3), 50-58 Stringer, P. (2004). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments and techniques. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 634-635. Stringer P., Elliott, J. & Lauchlan, F. (1996) 'Dynamic assessment and its potential for educational psychologists: Part 2 - The Zone of Next Development? Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(4), 234-239. Stubbe Kester, E., Peña, E., & Gillam, R. (2001). Outcomes of dynamic assessment with culturally and linguistically diverse students: A comparison of three teaching methods. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. 2, 42-59. Studer, C. (2013). Incorporating learning into the cognitive assessment framework. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section B: The Science and Engineering, 74(4-B9E)), no pagination specified. Summers, R. (2008). Dynamic assessment: Towards a model of dialogic engagement". Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/521 Unpublished dissertation, University of South Florida. Summers, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment: Towards a model of dialogic engagement. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 3736. Supancheck, P.M. (1990). Effects of a dynamic assessment approach with developmentally delayed children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(2-A), 462. Swanson, H.L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 473-488. Swanson, H.L. (1994). The role of working memory and dynamic assessment in the classification of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(4), 190-202. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 20 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Swanson, H.L. (1995a). Using the cognitive processing test to assess ability: Development of a dynamic assessment measure. School Psychology Review, 24, 672-693. Swanson, H.L. (1995b). Effects of dynamic testing on the classification of learning disabilities: The predictive and discriminant validity of the Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13(3), 204-229. Swanson, H.L. (1995c). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test (S-CPT). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Swanson, H.L. (1995d). Using the Cognitive Processing Test to assess ability: Development of a dynamic measure. School Psychology Review, 24, 672-693. Swanson, H.L. (2000). Swanson-Cognitive Processing Test: Review and applications. In C.S. Lidz and J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 71- 107. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier. Swanson,H.L. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28 (1). Swanson, H. L. (2010). Does the dynamic testing of working memory predict growth in nonword fluency and vocabulary in children with reading disabilities? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9(2), 139-165. Swanson, H.L. (2013). Linking children and adolescent assessment to effective instruction: An evidence-based perspective from the experimental literature. In Saklofske, Donald H. (Ed); Reynolds, Cecil R. (Ed); Schwean, Vicki L. (Ed). The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment. Oxford library of psychology., (pp. 822-839). NY: Oxford University Press. Swanson, H.L. (2016). Working memory and strategy instruction in children with learning disabilities. In R. Schiff & R. M. Joshi (Eds.). Interventions in learning disabilities: A handbook on systematic training programs for individuals with learning disabilities, 227-241. Switzerland: Springer International. Swanson, H.L. & Howard, C.B. (2005. Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 17-34. Swanson, H.L. & Lussier, C.M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363. Symons, S.E. & Vye, N.J. (1986). Instructional components of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (67th, San Francisco, CA, April 16-20). ED276771 DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 21 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 T BACK TO TOP Taheri, P. (2016). Dynamic assessment: A more comprehensive approach to interpret and capture L2 listening comprehension development. International Journal of Sciences and Research, 72 (12). 10-25. Taheri, R. & Dastjerdi, H.V. (2016). Impact of Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ picture-cued writing. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4 (13), 129-144. Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M. & Pakzadian, S/ (2012). Dynamic assessment and interlanguage pragmatics: Effects on the production of speech acts. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Tanggaard, L. & Glåveanu, V.P. (2014). Creativity assessment as intervention: The case of creative learning. Akademisk Kvarter (Academic Quarter), 9. Tanner, H. & Jones, S. (2002). Assessing children's mathematical thinking in practical modeling situations. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 21 (4), 145-159. Tatik, T. (2000). A concurrent validity study between the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale and the Leiter-Revised International Performance Test. Master's thesis; Touro College, New York, NY. ED445033 Tavakoli, M., & Nezakat-Alhossaini, M. (2014). Implementation of corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language classroom through dynamic assessment. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 211-232. Taylor, R.M. (1983). Evaluation of direct instruction Follow Through using a learning potential assessment instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(9-A), 2917-2918. Taylor, T.R. (1994). A review of three approaches to cognitive assessment, and a proposed integrated approach based on a unifying theoretical framework. South African Journal of Psychology, 24(4), 184-193. Tellegen, P.J. & Laros, J.A. (1993). The Snijders-Oomen nonverbal intelligence tests: General intelligence tests or tests for learning potential? In J.H.M.Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 267-283). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Tenner, A. (2008). Dynamic assessment of word attack skill in phonologically disabled readers. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 69 (5-A), 1719. Teo, A. & Fu Jen, F. (2012). Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning & Technology, 16 (3), 10–20. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/action.pdf DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 22 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Teo, P. & Roudenburg, J. (2013). Extensions of cognitive ability assessment with dynamic testing using self-regulated learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(2), 230-250. Teoh, W. Q., Brebner, C., & McAllister, S. (2017). Bilingual assessment practices: challenges faced by speech-language pathologists working with a predominantly bilingual population. Speech, Language and Hearing, 1-12. Thatcher, Kantor P., Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K. Comparing two forms of dynamic assessment and traditional assessment of preschool phonological awareness. J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug; 44(4):313-21. Thomas, D. (2014). Examining phonemic awareness in children with expressive phonological disorders. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 75(5-B )(E). Thorpe, P.K. (1998). A hierarchical linear modeling approach towards the dynamic assessment of mathematical conceptual learning. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 59(6-B), 3101. Thouesny, S. (2011). Modeling second language learners’ interlanguage and its variability: A computer-based dynamic assessment approach to distinguishing between errors and mistakes. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Dublin City University, Dublin. Thouesny, S., & Bradley, L. (2014). Applying dynamic assessment principles to online peer revisions in written English for specific purposes. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S. Thouesny (Eds). Principles and Practice; Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands (pp. 368-373). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2014.000247 Thurman, S.K. & McGrath, M.C. (2008). Environmentally based assessment practices: Viable alternatives to standardized assessment for assessing emergent literacy skills in young children. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 7-24. Tiekstra, Marlous; Minnaert, Alexander; Hessels, Marco G. P. A review scrutinising the consequential validity of dynamic assessment. Educational Psychology, Vol 36(1), Jan 2016, 112-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.915930 Tiekstra, M., Bergwerff, L. & Minnaert, A. (2017). Voices from practice: When is the gap between diagnosis and intervention apparent? Educational & Child Psychology, 34(1), 55-65. Ting, M.‐Y.; Kuo, B.‐C. (2016). A knowledge-structure-based adaptive dynamic assessment system for calculus learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2),105-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12119 Tissink, J., Hamers, J.H.M., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (1993). Learning potential tests with domain- general and domain-specific tasks. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 23 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 243-266). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. Tochahi, E.S. & Sangani, H.R. (2015). The impact of interactionist mediation phase of dynamic assessment as a testing tool to deviate anxious learners towards facilitative anxiety. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192 (24), 460-466. Toglia, J., & Cermak, S. A. (2009). Dynamic assessment and prediction of learning potential in clients with unilateral neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 569–579. Toglia, J. P. (1989). Approaches to cognitive assessment of the brain injured adult: Traditional methods and dynamic investigation. Occupational Therapy Practice, 1, 36-37. Toglia, J.M. (2004). Dynamic assessment and unilateral neglect. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 65(4-A), 1336. Topping, K. & Fisher, A.M. (2003). Computerized formative assessment of reading comprehension: Field trials in the UK. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(3), 267-279. Touw, K.J.W., Vogelaar, B., Verdel, R., & Resing, W.C.M. (2017). Children’s progress in solving figural analogies: Are outcomes of dynamic testing helpful for teachers? Educational Psychology, 34(1), 21-38. Tsuei, M.P. (2008). A web-based curriculum-based measurement system for class-wide ongoing assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 47-60. Tunteler, E. & Resing, W.C.M. (2007). Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children's unprompted analogical problem solving over time: A microgenetic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 43-68. Tupper, D.E. (1984). The dynamic assessment of learning potential in cognitive rehabilitation. INS Bulletin, November, p. 49. Tziona L. (2013). The Effect of Dynamic Assessment on the Performance of Students in Oral Proficiency Tests in English as a second language. Unpublished dissertation; Tel Aviv University (Israel). Tzuriel, D. (1989). Inferential cognitive modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 1, 65-80. Tzuriel, D. (1992). The dynamic assessment approach: A reply to Frisby and Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26, 302-324. Tzuriel, D. (1996a). Mediated learning experience in free-play versus structured situations among preschool low- medium- and high-SES. Child Development and Care, 126, 57-82. Tzuriel, D. (1996b). Inferential thinking modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. In M.G. Lother, E. Cole et al. (Eds.). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 146-157). North York, ON:Captus. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 24 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Tzuriel, D. (1997). A novel dynamic assessment approach for young Children: Major dimensions and current research. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83-102. Tzuriel, D. (1998a). Cognitive modifiability: The dynamic assessment of learning potential (in Hebrew), Tel-Aviv: Sifriat Poalim. Tzuriel, D. (1998b). Seria-Think Instrument. Instruction manual. Ramat Gan, Israel: Bar-Ilan University School of Education. Tzuriel, D. (Ed.) (1999a) Mediated learning experience: Theory, research, and applications (in Hebrew). Haifa: Ach Press, Oranim College, and the International Center for Enhancement of Learning Potential (ICELP). Tzuriel, D. (1999b). Parent-child mediated learning transactions as determinants of cognitive modifiability: Recent research and future directions, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125, 109-156. Tzuriel, D. (2000). The Seria-Think Instrument: Development of a dynamic test for young children. School Psychology International, 21(2),177-194. Tzuriel, D. (2000a). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. 12, 385-435. Tzuriel, D. (2000b). The Seria-Think instrument: A novel measure for assessment and intervention in seriational-computational domain. School Psychology International, 20, 173- 190. Tzuriel, D. (2000c). The Cognitive Modifiability Battery(CMB): Assessment and intervention. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Eds.). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375-406). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science. Tzuriel, D. (2000d). Developmental perspectives of mediated learning experience theory. In A.Kozulin & Y. Rand (Eds.). Experience of mediated learning:An impact of Feuerstein's theory in education and psychology (pp. 217-239). Elmsford,NY: Pergamon. Tzuriel, D. (2001a). Dynamic assessment is not dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 237- 249. Tzuriel, D. (2001b). Dynamic assessment of young children, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press. Tzuriel, D. (2001c). Dynamic assessment of learning potential. In J.J.W. Andrews, D.H. Saklofske, et al.(Eds.). Handbook of psychoeducational assessment: Ability, achievement, and behavior in children (pp. 451-496). San Diego,CA: Academic Press. Tzuriel, D. (2003a). Foundations of dynamic assessment of young children. In A. Seok-Hoon Seng, L. Kwee-Hoon Pou, & O-S Tan (Eds.). Mediated learning experience with children: Applications across contexts (pp. 173-188). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 25 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 [mghasia@mcgraw-hill.com] Tzuriel, D. (2003b). Dynamic assessment measures for young children. In A. Seok-Hoon Seng, L. Kwee-Hoon Pou, & O-S Tan (Eds.). Mediated learning experience with children: Applications across contexts (pp. 189-208). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia) [mghasia@mcgraw- hill.com] Tzuriel, D. (in press). Dynamic assessment of learning potential. Encyclopedia of Education. New York: McMillan Press. Tzuriel, D. (2007). Dynamic assessment: An integrative model for assessment of human learning and human functioning. PsycCRITIQUES, (52)48, [np]. doi: 10.1037/a0009273 Tzuriel, D. (2007). Transfer effects of teaching conceptual versus perceptual analogies. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6(2), 194-217. Tzuriel, D. (2011). Revealing the effects of cognitive education programmes through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (2), 113-131. Tzuriel, D. (2013a). Dynamic assessment of learning potential. Self-directed Learning Oriented Assessments in the Asia-Pacific. Springer Netherlands, 235-255. Tzuriel, D. (2013). Mediated learning experience and cognitive modifiability. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,12(1), 59-80. Tzuriel, D. (2014). Reuven Feuerstein: A giant in cognitive psychology. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13(3), 289-291. Tzuriel, D, Bengio, E, & Kashy-Rosenbaum, G. (2011). Cognitive modifiability, emotional- motivational factors, and behavioral characteristics among gifted versus non-gifted children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10(3), 253-279. Tzuriel, D. & Alfassi, M. (1994). Cognitive and motivational modifiability as a function of Instrumental Enrichment (IE) Program. Special Services in the Schools, 8, 91- 128. Tzuriel, D. & Caspi, N. (1992). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability in deaf and hearing preschool children. Journal of Special Education, 26, 235-252. Tzuriel, D., & Caspi, R. (2017). Intervention for peer mediation and mother-child interaction: The effects on children’s mediated learning strategies and cognitive modifiability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 302-323. Tzuriel, D. & Egozi, G. (2007). Dynamic assessment of spatial abilities of young childen: Effects of gender and task characteristics. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6(2), 219- 247. Tzuriel, D. & Eiboshitz, Y. (1992). A Structured program for visual motor integration (SP-VMI) for preschool children. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 103-124. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 26 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Tzuriel, D. & Eran, Z. (1990). Inferential cognitive modifiability as a function of mother-child mediated learning experience (MLE) interactions among Kibbutz young children. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 103-117. Tzuriel, D. & Ernst, H. (1990). Mediated learning experience and structural cognitive modifiability: Testing of distal and proximal factors by structural equation model. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 119-135. Tzuriel, D. & Feuerstein, R. (1992). Dynamic assessment for prescriptive teaching. In H.C.Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment. New York: Springer Verlag. Tzuriel, D., & Flor-Maduel, H. (2010). Prediction of early literacy by analogical thinking modifiability among kindergarten children., Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9(3), 207-226. Tzuriel, D. & Golinski, H. (1985). Teachers' social orientation and classroom achievements. British Journal of Subnormality, 9-18. Tzuriel, D., & Groman, T. (2017). Dynamic assessment of figurative language of children in the autistic spectrum: The relation to some cognitive and language aspects. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16(1), 38-63. Tzuriel, D., Isman, E. B., Klung, T., & Haywood, H. C. (2017). Effects of Teaching Classification on Classification, Verbal Conceptualization, and Analogical Reasoning in Children with Developmental Language Delays. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16(1), 107. Tzuriel, D. & Shamir, A. (2010). Mediation strategies and cognitive modifiability in young children as a function of peer mediation with young children program and training in analogies versus math tasks. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9 (1),48-72. Tzuriel, D. & Kaniel, S. (1993). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Theoretical and empirical aspects and implications for education and treatment. Megamot: Behavior Research Quarterly, 33, 271-292. Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Feuerstein,R., Eitan, T. & Ben-Schachar, N. (1991). Dynamic assessment, learning, and transfer abilities of Jewish Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. In R. Feuerstein, P. Klein, & A. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mediated learning experience. London: Freund. Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Kanner, E., & Haywood, H.C. (1999). The effectiveness of Bright Start program in kindergarten on transfer abilities and academic achievements. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 114, 111-141. Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Zeliger, M., Friedman, A., & Haywood, H.C. (1998). Effects of the "Bright Start" program in kindergarten on use of mediated learning strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability. Child Development and Care, 143, 1-20. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 27 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Tzuriel, D. & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 359-380. Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P.S. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular, special education and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539-552. Tzuriel, D. & Klein, P.S. (1987). Assessment the young child: Children's analogical thinking modifiability. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 268-287). New York: Guilford. Tzuriel, D. & Samuels, M. T.(1988). Non-intellective factors in dynamic assessment. In R.M. Gupta & P. Coxhead (Eds.). Cultural diversity and learning efficiency: Recent developments in assessment (pp. 141-163). New York: St. Martin'a Press. Tzuriel, D. & Samuels. M.T. (2000). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Inter-rater reliability of deficient cognitive functions, type of mediation, and non-intellective factors. Journal of Cognitive Education, 1, 1-23. Tzuriel, D., Samuels, M, & Feuerstein, R. (1988). Non-intellective factors in dynamic assessment.In R.M. Gupta & P. Coxhead (Eds.), Cultural diversity and learning efficiency. London: Macmillan. Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2002). The effects of mediation on seriational thinking modifiability in computer assisted dynamic assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 21-32. Tzuriel, D. & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on children's cognitive modifiability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 143-165. Tzuriel, D. & Weiss, S. (1998). Cognitive modifiability as a function of mother-child mediated learning strategies, mothers’ acceptance-rejection, and children's personality. Early Development and Parenting, 7, 79-99. Tzuriel, David. Revealing the effects of cognitive education programmes through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol 18(2), May 2011, 113- 131 Tzuriel, David; Bengio, Efrat; Kashy-Rosenbaum, Gabriella. Cognitive modifiability, emotional- motivational factors, and behavioral characteristics among gifted versus nongifted children. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, Vol 10(3), Nov 2011, 253-279. Tyler, A.A. (1996). Assessing stimulability in toddlers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29(4), 279-297. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 28 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 U BACK TO TOP Tochahi, E.S. & Sangani, H.R. (2015). The impact of interactionist mediation phase of dynamic assessment as a testing tool to deviate anxious learners towards facilitative anxiety. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192 (24), 460-466. Ukrainetz,T.A., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C. (2000).A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American children. Language, SPeech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 142-154. Unruh, S. & McKellar, N.A. (2017a). The challenges of assessing and intervening with English learners. In S. Unruh & N.A. McKellar (Eds.). Assessment and intervention for English Language learners: Translating research into practice (pp 1-19). NY: Springer International. Unrue, S. & McKellar, N.A. (2017). Assessment and intervention tools. In S. Unrue & N.A. McKellar (Eds.). Assessment and intervention for English language learners (pp. 159-175). Springer. Uprichard, S., Kupshik, G., Pine, K., & Fletcher, B. (2009). Dynamic assessment of learning ability improves outcome prediction following acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 23(4), 278- 290. V BACK TO TOP Valencia-Naranjo, N. & Robles-Bello. M.A. (2017). Learning potential and cognitive abilities in preschool boys with Fragile X and Down Syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60, (153-161). Vakil, E., Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D., Weiss, I., & Arzuoan, Y. (2011). Analogies solving by individuals with and without intellectual disability: Different cognitive patterns as indicated by eye movements; Research in Developmental Disabilities. 32(2). 846-856. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.08.006 van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Profiling second language sociolinguistic development through dynamically administered strategic interaction scenarios. Language & Communication, 37, 86- 99. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 29 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Van Compernolle, R. A., & Zhang, H. S. (2014). Dynamic assessment of elicited imitation: A case analysis of an advanced L2 English speaker. Language Testing. Van der Aalsvoort, G.M. (2008). Review of dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(2), 293-295. van der Aalsvoort, G.M., van Loo, F. & van Geert, P. (2012). Scaffolding: Meaningful sequences during the training phase of a learning potential test. ISRN Education, vol. 2012, van der Aalsvoort, G.M. & Lidz, C.S. (2002). Reciprocity in dynamic assessment in classrooms taking contextual influences on individual learning into account. In G.M.van der Aasvoort, W.C.M. Resing, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp.111-144). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. van der Aalsvoort, G.M., Resing, W.C.M., & Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M.(2002a) (Eds.). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science. van der Aalsvoort, G.M., Resing, W.C.M., & Ruijssenaars (2002b). New developments in learning potential and cognitive training. In: G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice Volume 7. Learning Potential Assessment and Cognitive Training (p.1-8). New York: Elsevier Science Ltd. Van Der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Scientific reasoning abilities in kindergarten: Dynamic assessment of the control of variables strategy. Instructional Science, 43(3), 381-400. Van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Scientific reasoning abilities in kindergarten: Dynamic assessment of the control of variables strategy. Instructional Science, An international Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10.1007/s11251-015-9344-y Van Der Veen, C., Dobber, M., & Van Oers, B. (accepted). Implementing dynamic assessment of vocabulary development as a trialogical learning process: A practice of teacher support in primary education schools. Language Assessment Quarterly An International Journal. Van der Veen, C., Dobber, M. & van Oers, B. (2016). Implementing dynamic assessment of vocabulary development as a trialogical learning process: A practice of teacher support in primary education schools. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal. Van der Veen, C. & Poland, M. (2012). Dynamic assessment of narrative competence. In B. Van Oers, (Ed.). Developmental education for young children: Concept, practice and implementación. International perspectives on early childhood education and development (105-119). NY: Springer. Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (1993). Learning potential assessment from a cross-cultural perspective. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, et al. (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 313-340). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 30 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Van Geert, P. (2014). Unfolding potential as dynamic emergence: A view from the Theory of complex, nonlinear dynamic systems. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 13(3), 324-356. Van Luit, J.E.H., Hamers, J.H.M., & Hessels, M.G.P. (1988). First Interim report of the project Learning potential test for Ethnic Minorities [Eerste Interimverslag van het project Leertest voor Etnische Minderheden]. Utrecht: ISOR, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht. Vaskinn, A., Sundet, K., Friis, S., Ueland, T., Simonsen, C., Birkenaes, A., Engh, J., Jonsdottir, H., Opjordsmoen, S., Ringen, P. A., & Andreassen, O. (2009). Using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to assess learning potential in normal IQ schizophrenia: Does it have potential? Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63,(5),405-411. Verbeke, W., Hessels, M., & Van der Linden, D. (1996). Attributions and Consequences of Trust: An application in a Retail Setting. Discussion paper TI 96-102/6. Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute. Verbeke, W., Hessels, M., & Volgering, M. (1996). Exploring the conceptual expansion within the field of organizational behavior: organizational climate and organizational culture. Discussion paper TI 96-150/6. Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute. Verhaegh, J., Fontijn, W., Aarts, E., & Resing, W.C.M., (2013). In-game assessment and training of nonverbal cognitive skills using TagTiles. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17, 1637-1646. 
 Verdon, S>, McLeod, S. & Wong, S. (2015). Supporting culturally and linguistically diverse children with Speech, language, and communications needs: Overarching principles, individual approaches. Journal of Communication Disorders, (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.10.002 Verschueren, K., & Resing, W.C.M. (2015). Intelligentiediagnostiek volgens het CHC model: van theorie naar praktijk. In W.C.M. Resing (Ed.), Handboek intelligentietheorie en testgebruik (pp.63-84). Amsterdam, Pearson. Vianello, R., Langranchi, S., Pulina, F., & Bidinost, S. (2012). Italian standardization of the dynamic version of the Logical Operations and Conservation Test (LOC-DV). Life Span and Disability, 15(1), 69-96. Vidergor, H.E. (2015). The multidimensional curriculum model. In H.E. Vidergor & C.R.Harris (Eds). Applied practice for educators of gifted and able learners. Sense Publ.,199-214. Visser, L., Ruiter, S.A., Van Der Meulen, J., Bieuwe, F., Ruijssenaars, W.A.J.J.M., & Timmerman, M.E. (2015). Dynamic assessment with the Bayley-III among young children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14 (1), 126-142. Vogelaar, B., Bakker, M., Elliott, J. G. and Resing, W. C. M. (2016), Dynamic testing and test anxiety amongst gifted and average-ability children. British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjep.12136 DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 31 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Vogelaar, B., Bakker, M., Hoogeveen, L., & Resing, W.C.M. (2017). Dynamic testing of gifted and average-ability children’s analogy problem solving: Does executive functioning play a role? Psychology in the Schools, January. DOI: 10.1002/pits.22032 Vogelaar, B. & Resing, W.C. M. (2016). Gifted and average-ability children’s progression in analogical reasoning in a dynamic testing setting. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(3). Vye, N.J., Burns, M.S., Delclos, V.R., & Bransford, J.D. (1987). A comprehensive approach to assessing intellectually handicapped children. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 327-359). New York: Guilford. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1955). Vygotsky, L. S. (2016). The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of General Psychology, Including the Volume Thinking and Speech. Springer. W BACK TO TOP Wade, K.M. & Haynes, W.O. (1989). Dynamic assessment of spontaneous language and cue responses in adult-directed and child-directed play: A statistical and descriptive analysis. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 5 (2), 157-173. Wagner, R.K & Compton, D.L. (2011). Dynamic Assessment and its Implications for RTI Models. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 311–312. Waldorf, M., Wiedl, K.H., & Schottke, H. (2009). On the concordance of three reliable change indexes: An analysis applying the Dynamic Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(1), 63-80. Waldorf, M., Pruß, L., & Wiedl, K. H. (2017). Is There More to Insight Into Illness in Schizophrenia Than Cognition? A Study Applying the Dynamic Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 16(1), 94 Walker, B.J. (1986). Diagnostic lessons as assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Plains National Conference of the International Reading Association (14th, Rapid City, SD, August 6-9). ED277976 Walker-Brown, P.A. (1987). Toward a dynamic assessment model for understanding literacy learning difficulties of adolescents. Case studies in a Mennonite high school. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(3-A), 619. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 32 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Wang, P. (2015). The effect of dynamic assessment on the listening skills of lower-intermediate EFL learners in Chinese technical college: A pilot study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6 (6), 1269-1279. Wang, T-H. (2010). Web - based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students’ e - learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, Vol 54(4), May, 1157-1166. Wang, T-H. (2011). Implementation of Web - based dynamic assessment in facilitating junior high school students to learn mathematics. Computers & Education, 56(4),1062-1071. Wang, T-H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 73, 189-203. Wang, T. H., Kubincová, Z., Lin, C. Y., Chou, C. C., Chiu, F. Y., Hsieh, M. L. & Farhan, M. (2017). E-Assessment and Its Role and Possibility in Facilitating Future Teaching and Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(4), 1041-1043. Wang, Y., & Heffernan, N. T. (2014, January). The Effect of Automatic Reassessment and Relearning on Assessing Student Long-Term Knowledge in Mathematics. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 490-495). Springer International Publishing. Watzke, S. (2013). Dynamisch kognitives Testen in der Auswahl optimater rehabilitativer Versorgungsangebote (Dynamic cognitive testing for selecting the optimal vocational rehabilitation strategy). Nervenheilkunde Zeitschrift für interdisziplinaere Fortibildung, 32(6), 363-369. Watzke, S., Brieger, P., Kuss, O., Schoettke, H., & Wiedl,K.H. (2008). A longitudinal study of learning potential and rehabilitation outcome in schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 59, 248- 255. Watzke, S., Brieger, P. & Wiedl, K.H. (2009). Prediction of vocational rehabilitation outcome in schizophrenia: Incremental prognostic validity of learning potential beyond basic cognitive performance. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(1), 52-62. Weingartz, S., Wiedl, K.H., & Watzke, S. (2008). Dynamic assessment of executive functioning: (How) can we measure change? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(3), 368-387 Weisgerber, J. (2015). Bridging the Gap Between Instruction and Assessment: Examining the Role of Dynamic Assessment in the Oral Proficiency Skills of English-as-an-Additional- Language Learners. The Arbutus Review, 6(1), 25-40. Weiss, P. (2001). Comparison of performance on a dynamic assessment ofa comples figure in healthy adults with rehabilitation clients suffering from schizophrenia. (Unpublished master’s thesis) Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Wellisch, M. & Porath, M. (2013). The elusive search for the gifted personality. Talent Development & Excellence, 5(2), DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 33 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Wen, K. (2013). Model building and empirical research: Foreign language teaching writing dynamic assessment (Chinese edition). Nanjing University. Wenke, R. J., Goozée, J.V., Murdoch, B.E., & LaPointe, L.L. (2006). Dynamic assessment of articulation during lingual fatigue in myasthenia gravis. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 1491). 13-31. Wertsch, J.V. (2004). Dynamic testing as the future of mental assessment. Contemporary Psychology, 49(1), 91-93. Wiedl, K.H. (1980). Kompensatorische Interventionen im Rahmen intelligenzdiagnostisher Untersuchungen bei kognitiv impulsiven Kindern (Compensatory interventions during intelligence assessment with impulsive children). Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie, 9 219- 231. Wiedl, K.H. (1984). Lerntests: nur Forschungsmittel und Forschungsgegenstand? Zeitschrift fur Entwicklunspsychologie und Pedogogische Psychologie, 16, 245-281. Wiedl, K.H. (1999). Cognitive modifiability as a measure of readiness for rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), 1411-1413. Wiedl, K.H. (2001). Dynamic assessment of cognitive rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic persons and in elderly persons with and without dementia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 112-119. Wiedl, K.H. (2003). Dynamic testing: A comprehensive model and current fields of application. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology [online], 3, 93-119. www.iace.coged.org Wiedl, K.H. (2009). Editorial. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(1), 4. Wiedl, K.H. & Bethge, H.J. (1983). Die Anpassung der aufgabenbezogenen Betrachtungszeit an variierende Aufgabenschwierigkeiten: deskriptive und veranderungsbezogone Analysen bei kognitiv impulsiven und reflexiven Kindern (Adapting inspection time of test items to item difficulty: Descriptive analyses and evaluation of change in impulsive and reflective children.) Zeitschrift fur Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 67-77. Wiedl, K.H. & Carlson, J.S. (1985). The dynamic testing approach: Theoretical conceptions and practical applications. In G.d'Ydewalle (Eds.). Cognition, information processing, and motivation (pp. 891-890). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Wiedl, K.H. & Guthke, J. (im Druck). Dynamische Untersuchungsverfahren in der Personalauswahl (Dynamic assessment in the selection of personnel). In H. Holling & K.-C. Hamborg (Hrsg). Innovative Ansatze der Personal-und Organisationsentwicklung. Gottingen: Hogrefe. Wiedl, K.H., Guthke, J., & Wingenfeld, S. (1995). Dynamic assessment in Europe: Historical perspectives. In J.S. Carlson (Eds.). Advances in cognition and educational practice: European contributions to dynamic assessment (Volume 3, pp. 33-82). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Wiedl, K.H. & Herrig, D. (1978). Okologische Validitat und Schulerfolgsprognose im Lern-und Intelligenztest: eine exemplarische Studie (Ecological validity and the prediction of school DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 34 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 performance with the help of a learning test vs. static intelligence test: An exemplary study.) Diagnostica, 24, 175-186. Wiedl, K.H., Mata, S., Waldorf, M. & Calero , M.D. (2014). Dynamic testing with native and immigrant preschool children in Germany and Spain, using the Application of Cognitive Functions Scale. Learning and Individual Differences 35. 34–40. Wiedl, K.H. & Schottke, H. (1995). Dynamic assessment of selective attention in schizophrenic subjects: The analysis of intraindividual variablility of performance. In J.S. Carlson (Eds.). Advances in cognition and educational practice: European contributions to dynamic assessment (volume 3; pp. 185-203). Grenwich, CT: JAI Press. Wiedl, K.H.& Schottke, H. (2002a). Vorhersage des Erfolgs schizophrener Patienten in einem psychoedukativen Behandlungsprogramm durch Indikatoren des Veranderungspotentials im Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Predicting schizophrenic patients' proficiency in a psychoeducation treatment program with the help of indicatorsof potential for change in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.). Verhaltenstherapie, 12, 90-96. Wield, K.H. & Schottke, H. (2002b). Ein modell zur Vorhersage des Rehabilitationserfolgs schizophrener Patienten (A prediction model for schizophrenic patients' success in rehabilitation). Vortrag auf der 43. Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie in Berlin (Paper presented at the 43rd conference of the German Association of Psychology, Berlin). Wiedl, K.H., Schoettke, H., & Calero, M.D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of cognitive rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic persons and in elderly persons with and without dimentia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 112-119. Wiedl, K.H., Shottke, H., Green, M.F. & Neuchterlein, K.H.(2004). Dynamic testing in schizophrenia: Does training change the construct validity of a test? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 703-711. Wiedl, K.H., Wienobst, J., & Schottke, H. (2001). Estimating rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic subjects. In H.D. Brenner, W. Boker, & R Genner (Eds.). The treatment of schizophrenia-status and emerging trends (pp. 88-103). Bern: Hogrefe & Huber. Wiedl, K.H., Wienobst, J., Schottke, H., Green, M.F., & Neuchterlein, K.H. (2001). Attentional characateristics of schizophrenic patients differing in learning proficiency in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Schizophrenic Bulletin, 27 (4), 687-695. Wiedl, K.H., WIenobst, J., Schottke, H., & Kauffeldt, S. (1999). Differentielle Aspekte kognitiver Remediation bei schizophren Erkankten auf der Grundlage des Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Differential aspects of cognitive remediation with schizoprhenic persons using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.) Zeitschrift fur Klinishche Psychologie, 28(3), 214-219. Wilde Bacigalupo M. Del C. (2010). Aplicaciones y métodos mención: salud habilidades, actitudes y potencial de aprendizaje en preescolares: un análisis transcultural tesis doctoral. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Granada (Spain). Wilhelm, R. L. (2010). Evaluating the use of dynamic assessment to predict math success in community colleges. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 35 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Sciences, 88. Williams, M. B. (2017). Linguistically Based Spelling Analysis and its Relation to Early School Literacy Success. Williams, R.H. & Zimmerman, D.W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete? Applied Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 59-69. Willis, R.E. (1999). An evaluation of four remediation methods within computer-based instruction (intelligent tutoring). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 60 (4-B), 1882. Wingenfeld, S.A. (1992). Dynamic and neuropsychological assessment of the cognitive functioning of learning disabled and non-learning disabled adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(11-B), 6102. Winke, P. M., & Isbell, D. R. (2017). Computer-Assisted Language Assessment. Language, Education and Technology, 1-13. Wittkopp, Carmen, "Bilingual Language Assessment" (2017). Honors Theses. 2836. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/2836 Woiter,J. A. & Pike, K. (2015). Dynamic assessment of morphological awareness and third grade literacy success. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 46 (2). Wolf, M. K., & Butler, Y. G. (Eds.). (2017). English Language Proficiency Assessments for Young Learners. Taylor & Francis. Wolf, M.K., Guzman-Orth, D., Lopez, A., Castellano, K., Himelfarb, I., & Tsutagawa, F.S. (2016). Integrating scaffolding strategies into technology-enhanced assessments of English learners: Task types and measurement models. Educational Assessment, DOI: 10:1080/10627197.2016.1202107. Wood, K.D. (1988). Techniques for assessment students' potential for learning. Reading Teacher, 41(4), 440-447. Woods, K. & Farrell, P. (2006). Approaches to psychological assessment by educational psychologists in England and Wales. School Psychology International, 27(4), 387-404. Wright, C., Litinas, A., Palaktsoglou, M., & Tsianikas, M. (2013). Planning for authentic language assessment in higher education synchronous online environments. Journal of Modern Greek Studies – Special Issue, 246–258. Wright, C., Litinas, A., Palaktsoglou, M. & Tsianikas, M.(2015). Modern Greek at tertiary level: applying innovative methods of effective assessment and delivery online. In: M. Tsianikas,G. Couvalis and M. Palaktsoglou (eds.) "Reading, interpreting, experiencing: an inter-cultural journey into Greek letters". Modern Greek Studies Association of New Zealand, 251-274. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 36 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Wu, H. M., Kuo, B. C., & Wang, S. C. (2017). Computerized Dynamic Adaptive Tests with Immediately Individualized Feedback for Primary School Mathematics Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (1), 61–72. X BACK TO TOP Xiaoxiao, L.,& Yan, L.(2010). A case study of dynamic assessment in EFL process writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 24-40. Y BACK TO TOP Yakışık, B.Y. & Çakır. A. (2017). Dynamic assessment of prospective: English teachers’ speaking skills. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 22-49. Yang, Y., Qian, D.D. (2017) Assessing English reading comprehension by Chinese EFL learners in computerized dynamic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 7 (11), Yazbek, Z. S. (2008). The effect of mediation on Lebanese preschoolers’ performance skills of classification, sequential pattern completion, and percpective taking. Unpublished masters thesis, Department of Education, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, American University of Beirut (Lebanon). Yeomans, J. (2008) Dynamic assessment practice: Some suggestions for ensuring follow up. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(2), 105-114. Yang, L., Krampe, R., & Baltes, P. (2006). Basic forms of cognitive plasticity extended into the oldest-old: Retest learning, age, and cognitive functioning. Psychology and Aging, 21, 372-378. Yerle, A. (1992). Etude de la fidélité du potentiel d'apprentissage, mémoire de D.E.A. Paris: Université René Descartes, doc. miltig. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 37 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Yildirim, A. G. O. (2008). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and dynamic assessment in language learning. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 301-308. Yildirim, Ö. (2008). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and dynamic assessment in language learning. Anadolu University. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 301-307. Yu, C. T., Martin, T., Vause, T., & Martin, G. (2015). Kerr-Meyerson Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities-Revised: Recent findings and a conceptual analysis of ordering. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 55-66. Z BACK TO TOP Zaaiman,H., van der Flier, H., & Thijs, G.D. (2001). Dynamic testing in selection for an educational programme: Assessing South African performance on the Raven Progressive Matrices. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9(3), 258-269. Zambrana-Ortiz, N. (1992). La escala de experiencia de aprendizaje mediado (EAM): Un nuevo motodo para nuevos retos en la evaluacion dinamica de ninos/as [The scale of mediated learning experience: A method for new challenges in the dynamic assessment of boys and girls]. Revista Puertorriquena de Psicologia, 8, 177-208. Zarinkamar, N. & Naeini, J. (2015). Dynamic assessment: An indication of diagnostic approach in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. ELT Voices-International Journal for Teachers of English, 5(4), 66-74. Zeidner, M., Matthews, G., & Roberts, R.D. (2004). Intelligence theory, assessment, and research: The Israeli experience. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), International handbook of intelligence (pp. 212-247). New York: Cambridge University Press. Zeppuhar, M.E. (1999). Eliciting information about knowledge structures in persons with mental retardation through the use of dynamic assessment and prototype theory. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 99-109. Zhang, H.S., & Van Compernolle, R.A. (2015). Learning potential and the dynamic assessment of L2 Chinese grammar through elicited imitation. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 3(1), 99-119. Zhang, R-C, Lai, H-M, Cheng, P-W, & Chen, C-P (2017). Longitudinal effect of a computer- based graduated prompting assessment on students’ academic performance. Computers & Education, 11, 181-194. Zhang, L. & Zhang, Z. (2014). The contribution of dynamic assessment to screening children with mathematics learning disabilities. Acta Psychological Sinica, 46(8), 1112-1123. DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHOR NAMES R – Z 38 | P a g e O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 1 7 Zhang, Y. (2008). The dynamic assessment mode for online EFL writing classes. Foreign Language World 4, 15 Zhou, T-S. (1998). Dynamic assessment: Development and improvement on children's potential media-style learning. Taipei: Psychology Publisher. Zia, Z., Alemi, M., & Pakzadian, S. (2012). Dynamic Assessment and Interlanguage Pragmatics: Effects on the Production of Speech Acts. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. Zitting, L. (2016). The dynamic assessment of narratives: Evidence of validity, reliability and fidelity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University. Zolezzi, S.A. (2002). The effectiveness of dynamic assessment as an alternative aptitude testing strategy. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 63 (1-A), 90. BACK TO TOP R S T U V W X Y Z