Show simple item record

Lashon Ha-ra (the Evil Tongue) and the Problem of Jewish Unity

dc.creatorBernsen , Charles Jay
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-23T15:44:36Z
dc.date.available2012-12-06
dc.date.issued2011-12-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-11142011-185139
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/14518
dc.description.abstractRELIGION LASHON HA-RA (THE EVIL TONGUE) AND THE PROBLEM OF JEWISH UNITY CHARLES BERNSEN Dissertation under the direction of Professor Shaul Kelner The premise of this project is that the ancient rabbinic prohibition against lashon hara — the sin of speaking badly about another Jew — is more than an ethical concept governing interpersonal relations. Because it has implications for discourse aimed at excluding or marginalizing social deviance and independence, the prohibition against lashon ha-ra mediates the tension inherent in the question of how much difference and autonomy can be tolerated within Jewish society. Part I examines contested notions of lashon ha-ra in early rabbinic texts. It identifies two main traditions — one that is quite restrictive of demeaning or harmful speech and another that is more tolerant of it. The former was more prevalent among rabbis who were socially or politically vulnerable. The latter was more prevalent among rabbis who were more powerful and felt relatively more secure. Part II looks at how this tension plays out in Sefer Chafetz Chaim, the nineteenth-century legal code and commentary on lashon ha-ra by Lithuanian Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan. Like the early rabbis who emphasized the danger of lashon hara, Kagan was responding to the presence of polemical discourse that he viewed as a profound threat to Jewish social cohesion. But also like the early rabbis there were limits to his concern. Although his primary aim was to suppress rhetoric that was alienating Jews from each other, he nevertheless permitted and even encouraged it for certain pragmatic, ethical and ideological purposes. I argue that in regard to delimiting Jewish collective identity, Kagan responded pragmatically to the forces of religious divergence at work among traditional Lithuanian Jews while at the same time emphatically rejecting the ideology of the Jewish enlightenment that challenged the primacy of traditional texts and the authority of rabbis to interpret them.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectamitekha
dc.subjectchaver
dc.subjectslander
dc.subjectgossip
dc.titleLashon Ha-ra (the Evil Tongue) and the Problem of Jewish Unity
dc.typedissertation
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDr. Jay Geller
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDr. Martina Urban
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDr. Richard McGregory
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDr. Philip Ackerman-Lieberman
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.namePHD
thesis.degree.leveldissertation
thesis.degree.disciplineReligion
thesis.degree.grantorVanderbilt University
local.embargo.terms2012-12-06
local.embargo.lift2012-12-06
dc.contributor.committeeChairDr. Shaul Kelner


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record