Global Leaders: Defining Relevant Leadership for the 21st Century
Gray, Bradley S.
:
2006-12-11
Abstract
LEADERSHIP AND POLICY STUDIES
GLOBAL LEADERS: DEFINING RELEVANT LEADERSHIP
FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
BRADLEY STEVEN GRAY
Dissertation under the direction of Professor Robert L. Crowson
After an age of leadership defined by the norms and demands of an industrial era, the forces of globalization at the beginning of the 21st century, primarily ushered in by logarithmic advances of technology, have created the demand for leadership, identified in this phenomenological study as “global leadership.” Based upon demand identifiers describing the realities of the current stage(s) of globalization–bypass, simultaneity, mobility, pluralism, change, and integration–six leadership capacities were extrapolated to establish criteria upon which to analyze an effective leader in this context. Foundational is a distinction between “competencies” and “capacities” in global leadership. Where competencies are skill and task based with limited ability to fulfill adaptive work, capacities are skills and abilities that enable one to regenerate growth based on adaptive challenges, and thus innovation. The six global leader capacities forming the filter for analysis are the capacity for self-transformation, capacity of the contextual self, capacity for omnicompetence, capacity for reframing the gifts of leadership, capacity for ethnorelativism, and the capacity for transcendence. In the case of the global leader, these six capacities engage simultaneously to create the synergistic phenomenon. Two archetypal cases are considered. Findings identify that global leaders are found throughout societies although few of them are noticed because the infrastructure of leadership development, including the education systems, are geared to develop leaders for industrial model work. Global leaders are not necessarily international leaders, and it is not a contradiction for a global leader not to lead in an international context. A corollary relationship between pairs of the criteria capacities surfaces as three interacting systems: problem solving system, motivation leadership system, and transcendent leadership system, a sophisticated relationship of behaviors. Most useful are the six criteria and their systemic, integrated engagement in the global leader as these are viable as units of development. The study identifies a developmental process, and a developmental model that applies across sectors of work, ethnic, and national backgrounds. Global leadership is a human phenomenon, not confined to sector of work, geography, or other limiting boundaries, real or created.
Approved: Robert L. Crowson Date: November 6, 2006
Files in this item
This item appears in the following collection(s):
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Rankin, Beth Anne (2020-12)This study focused on teacher perceptions regarding individual and organizational conditions, knowledge, experience, and supports needed to foster teacher leadership engagement at all levels. Using a transformational teacher ...
-
Johnson, William L. (2021-08-04)Fission (pseudonym) faces the challenge of developing new leaders with the skills necessary to lead the workforce of the future, while attempting to help experienced leaders change their beliefs about effective leadership. ...
-
Leveraging Stakeholder Insights to Improve Community College Student Leadership Development Efficacy Gloyer, Sharon M.; Mattison, Tammalette M. (2023-05)LeaderShape is an independent, not-for-profit organization that develops and delivers leadership development programs primarily targeting college and university students. LeaderShape’s growth platform includes a strategic ...