Show simple item record

Protests and Reputation

dc.contributor.authorBuenrostro, Lucia
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, Amrita
dc.contributor.authorWooders, Myrna
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T00:31:02Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T00:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/15804
dc.description.abstractProtests take place for a variety of reasons. In this paper we focus on protests that have a well defined objective, that is in conflict with the objectives of the government. Hence the success or failure of a protest movement depends crucially on how the government responds. We assume that government types are private information so that governments have an interest in building a reputation to deter protestors. We extend the standard reputation framework to one where potential protesters in the domestic jurisdiction are competing in a common market with protestors of a foreign jurisdiction, resulting in a situation where domestic governments care about the decisions of foreign governments. We derive conditions under which an equilibrium with "contagion" in protests might exist: protests that start in one jurisdiction spread to others. Finally we use our results to interpret the Fuel tax protests in France and England that took place in 2000 as well as the three successive pro-democracy revolutions in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan in 2003-05.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherVanderbilt Universityen
dc.subjectProtest
dc.subjectsocial movements
dc.subjectcontagion
dc.subjectreputation equilibrium
dc.subjectFuel tax protests
dc.subjectpro-democracy revolutions
dc.subjectF50
dc.subjectC72
dc.subjectD72
dc.subjectD82
dc.subject.other
dc.titleProtests and Reputation
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.description.departmentEconomics


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record