Show simple item record

Trade Skirmishes and Safeguards: A Theory of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process

dc.contributor.authorBeshkar, Mostafa
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T01:08:15Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T01:08:15Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/15856
dc.description.abstractI model the World Trade Organization as an impartial arbitrator with no enforcement power which issues public signals correlated with the state of the world in the disputing countries. Such public signals, by mitigating the information asymmetry among the negotiating governments, make it easier to write an incentive-compatible agreement. The reciprocity principle embodied in the GATT Article XIX ensures an incentive compatible agreement by allowing occasional trade skirmishes. The WTO Safeguard Agreement, when supported with impartial arbitration, can improve political welfare by curbing trade skirmishes while keeping the incentive constraints in check. Impartial arbitration improves the enforceability of trade agreements without providing external enforcement.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherVanderbilt Universityen
dc.subjectSafeguard agreement
dc.subjectdispute settlement
dc.subjectimpartial arbitration
dc.subjecttrade agreements
dc.subjectF13
dc.subjectF51
dc.subjectF53
dc.subjectC72
dc.subjectK33
dc.subjectK41
dc.subject.other
dc.titleTrade Skirmishes and Safeguards: A Theory of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.description.departmentEconomics


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record