Show simple item record

Unjust Timing Limitations in Genetic Malpractice Cases

dc.contributor.authorClayton, Ellen W.
dc.contributor.authorMarchant, Gary
dc.contributor.authorLeRoy, Bonnie
dc.contributor.authorClatch, Lauren
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T20:29:37Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T20:29:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citation83 Albany Law Review 2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/17111
dc.descriptionpublished article on genetic malpractice casesen_US
dc.description.abstractAs genomic data are increasingly being collected and applied in clinical care, physicians, laboratories, and other health care providers are more frequently being sued for alleged medical malpractice or negligence. Because the genetic underpinnings of an existing or future health condition may not be immediately apparent, such cases sometimes raise unique timing issues involving the applicable statute of limitations, statute of repose, or statutory notification requirements. Although these timing limitations on when a lawsuit can be brought have important policy rationales and justifications, such as helping to protect providers from open-ended liability, their application to genetic liability cases may sometimes result in fundamental unfairness and unjust results because of the unavoidable delayed discovery of the potential negligence in detecting or addressing the genetic contribution of a patient's condition.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAlbany Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectgenetic malpractice, timing limitations, statute of reposeen_US
dc.titleUnjust Timing Limitations in Genetic Malpractice Casesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record