Vanderbilt University
Jean & Alexander Heard Library Vanderbilt University

Do Open-Ended Questions Measure "Salient" Issues?

DiscoverArchive/Manakin Repository

Do Open-Ended Questions Measure "Salient" Issues?

Show full item record

Title: Do Open-Ended Questions Measure "Salient" Issues?
Author: Geer, John Gray
Abstract: Closed-ended questions dominate most interview schedules. Yet the almost exclusive use of this form did not arise because open-ended questions, its major competitor, proved to be weak indicators of public opinion. Instead, responses from open-ended questions proved more difficult and expensive to code and analyze than those from closed-ended questions. Although such practical concerns are important, the real task of survey researchers is to measure public opinion accurately. Using an experimental design, this article tests whether open-ended questions measure the important concerns of respondents' one of the long-claimed advantages of this format. The results, on balance, show that open-ended comments reflect such concerns, suggesting that pollsters may want to include more of these questions in their surveys of public opinion.
Description: Originally published in Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 55, no. 3 (p. 360-370).
Subject: Salient issues
Open-ended questions
LCSH Subject: Public opinion polls -- Methodology
Public opinion -- United States
United States -- Politics and government -- Public opinion
URI: http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/vol55/issue3/index.dtl
http://hdl.handle.net/1803/4052
Date: 1991

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Do Open-ended Questions Measure 'Salient' Issues.pdf 1.184Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search DiscoverArchive


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Information