Behavioral Economics and Microfinance: A Study of Risk Preferences in Rural South Africa

DiscoverArchive/Manakin Repository

About  |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Heuser, Brian Lloyd
dc.contributor.author Leiberman, Eric M.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-18T15:36:50Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-18T15:36:50Z
dc.date.issued 2011-04-05
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1803/4812
dc.description By replicating the seminal work of Kahneman and Tversky in rural South Africa, the present study shows that female borrowers from the Small Enterprise Foundation microfinance bank do not exhibit loss aversion and have very different risk preferences than Western subjects. PSYC 2990, Honors Program in Psychological Sciences, Professor Craig Smith. en_US
dc.description.abstract When deciding between safe and risky prospects, human decision-makers exhibit a number of framing effects. One of the most prominent of these effects, the reflection effect, is the tendency for decision makers to evaluate gambles relative to a reference point, and to act risk-seeking when prospects are framed as losses but risk-averse when identical prospects are framed as gains. This tendency is one of the primary predictions of Prospect Theory, the modified Expected Utility Theory that was proposed by Nobel laureates Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. The present study seeks to closely replicate the work of the Nobel laureates in the cross-cultural setting of rural South Africa with subjects who are extremely poor. Using a similar choice problem to that of Kahneman and Tversky’s Asian Disease Study, we show that subjects exhibit an alternate reversal of risk preferences depending on whether outcomes are presented as Gains or Losses. These results seem to suggest that poor South African women exhibit similar framing effects but that their risk preferences are the complete opposite of the Western Kahneman and Tversky subjects. This study therefore finds a skewed preference for risk and loss in its cross-cultural subjects and suggests that specific decision-making phenomena are not necessarily universal. The implications of this study are wide reaching, as they move closer to a theory of how poverty influences decision-making. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Thesis completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Honors Program in Psychological Sciences en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Vanderbilt University en_US
dc.subject behavioral economics en_US
dc.subject microfinance en_US
dc.subject framing effect en_US
dc.subject loss aversion en_US
dc.subject decision making en_US
dc.subject poor en_US
dc.subject south africa en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Cognitive psychology en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Poverty -- Psychological aspects en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Decision making en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Ethnopsychology en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Risk assessment -- Psychological aspects en_US
dc.title Behavioral Economics and Microfinance: A Study of Risk Preferences in Rural South Africa en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.school Vanderbilt University en_US
dc.description.department Psychological Sciences en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DiscoverArchive


My Account