Vanderbilt University
Jean & Alexander Heard Library Vanderbilt University

Working to win vs. working to keep: Prospect Theory and effort-based decision-making in humans

DiscoverArchive/Manakin Repository

Working to win vs. working to keep: Prospect Theory and effort-based decision-making in humans

Show full item record

Title: Working to win vs. working to keep: Prospect Theory and effort-based decision-making in humans
Author: Roman, Olivia C.
Abstract: Reward processing studies of anhedonia have provided a great deal of support to the idea that this common symptom of depression and schizophrenia is characterized in part by decreased motivation to pursue rewards. However, there is also compelling evidence that reward and loss processing are linked, suggesting that anhedonic individuals may also experience reduced motivation to avoid a loss. Using a modified version of the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task, this study examined undergraduates’ behavior when working to win money versus working to avoid losing money, and how this behavior reflected trait anhedonia, depression, and anxiety. Consistent with Prospect Theory, participants were more likely to expend effort to avoid a loss. However, no correlations were observed between performance and self-reported personality/psychopathological traits.
Description: Thesis describes humans' decisional behavior in regards to working to win money and working to avoid losing money, how it could relate to anhedonia, and how the results reflect the tenets of Prospect Theory.
Subject: Prospect Theory
anhedonia
decision-making
motivation
LCSH Subject: Anhedonia
Motivation (Psychology)
Reward (Psychology)
Decision making
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1803/5073
Date: 2012-04-03

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Thesis.docx 96.27Kb Microsoft Word View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search DiscoverArchive


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Information