mirage

Roadblocks to Publishing Obscenity and Blasphemy in Ulysses and The Satanic Verses

DiscoverArchive/Manakin Repository

About  |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Gottfried, Roy
dc.contributor.advisor Wollaeger, Mark
dc.contributor.author DeBell, Liz
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-02T20:16:20Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-02T20:16:20Z
dc.date.issued 2012-04-24
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1803/5131
dc.description English Department Honors Thesis. en_US
dc.description.abstract The publishing industry is in such turmoil—thanks to digital publishing platforms which offer higher royalties and instant gratification to authors—that nearly every day a new story comes to light of a bookstore closing, or a digital publishing success, giving doomsayers foretelling the death of the industry and the downfall of publishing houses endless material. While their claims are, in part, correct—the industry cannot go back to the way it was before the introduction of e-readers and Amazon—a glance backward to self-publishing in the past suggests that the industry is constantly in flux, and changes, whether in the realm of obscenity, blasphemy, or technology, inevitably impact the industry. Of course, even using the words “self-publishing” brings to mind a very specific definition, yet this definition has changed over time. Once, it brought to mind images of vanity presses, but now most of the buzz surrounding self-publishing is in the digital world. These developments have given rise to a number of anxieties in the publishing community: how will publishing houses make themselves relevant in the digital publishing world? What is the future of the publishing industry? Does a text carry the same weight as “literature” when published online as when published in print? Do we value literature less when it’s sold at discount prices? While I don’t presume to have the answers to these questions, my hope is that examining cases of self-publishing in the past will shed light on the new developments in the industry. With these issues in mind, in the following pages I will turn to Ulysses, examining three different written texts that appear: Martha’s letter, Deasy’s published letter, and Stephen’s unpublished verse. Turning next to The Satanic Verses, we see that blasphemy, not obscenity, forced Salman Rushdie to evade the traditional publishing system, even though his novel was initially much heralded in literary circles. Then, in a brief final discussion, I will reflect on how these issues of obscenity, blasphemy, and self-publishing play out today in the digital realm. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Vanderbilt University en_US
dc.subject blasphemy and literature en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Self-publishing -- History en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Digital publishing -- History en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Joyce, James, 1882-1941. Ulysses en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Joyce, James, 1882-1941 -- Censorship en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Rushdie, Salman. Satanic verses en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Rushdie, Salman -- Censorship en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Obscenity (Law) en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Blasphemy in literature en_US
dc.title Roadblocks to Publishing Obscenity and Blasphemy in Ulysses and The Satanic Verses en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.college College of Arts and Science en_US
dc.description.department English Department en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DiscoverArchive


Browse

My Account