Now showing items 647-666 of 1354

    • Sherry, Suzanna (Wake Forest L. Rev., 2003)
      For forty years, legal academics have been lost in a wilderness born of the countermajoritarian difficulty. Despite a two-century pedigree, we are still arguing about the legitimacy of judicial review and asking whether ...
    • George, Tracey E.; Williams, Margaret S. (Judicature, 2014)
      The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (or "MDL Panel") is one of a small number of special federal courts created pursuant to Article III by Congress and staffed by a Chief-Justice-appointed group ...
    • Guthrie, Chris; Rachlinski, Jeffrey John; Wistrich, Andrew J. (Judicature, 2002)
      The institutional legitmacy of the judiciary depends on the quality of the judgments that judges make. Even the most talented and dedicated judges surely make occasional mistakes, but the public expects judges to avoid ...
    • George, Tracey E.; Berger, Jeffrey A. (2006)
      Federal courts of appeals are constrained by the power and preferences of the Supreme Court. The principal-agent model reveals that circuit judges gain power largely by avoiding review. We consider, however, whether circuit ...
    • Sherry, Suzanna (Notre Dame Law Review, 1999)
      One little-noticed side effect of the litigation explosion in this country is the exponential growth of federal doctrines designed to simplify complex litigation. Many of these doctrines have been created and applied largely ...
    • George, Tracey E., 1967- (Ohio State Law Journal, 2003)
      Is the federal judiciary truly an independent body? A quick glance at the Constitution would suggest the answer is yes. The Constitution provides for life tenure and a difficult removal process for federal judges that ...
    • Sherry, Suzanna (Georgia State University Law Review, 1998)
      I begin with a question: why have a conference on judicial independence? To find the answer, one need only read the newspapers. Judicial independence-as well as its political counterpart, judicial impeachment-is a hot topic ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Stanford Law Review, 2005)
      Prosecutors control statutory ranges by selecting charges. In addition, prosecutors decide whether to use or forego special sentencing statutes that carry mandatory minimum penalties higher than the maximum Guidelines ...
    • Guthrie, Chris; Rachlinski, Jeffrey J.; Wistrich, Andrew J. (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017)
      In twenty-five different experiments conducted on over 2,200 judges, we assessed whether judges' political ideology influences their resolution of hypothetical cases. Generally, we found that the political ideology of the ...
    • Viscusi, W. Kip; Cecof, Caroline (George Mason Law Review, 2015)
      This Article evaluates judicial review of agency benefit-cost analysis ("BCA") by examining a substantial sample of thirty-eight judicial decisions on agency actions that implicate BCA. Essentially, the Administrative ...
    • Bressman, Lisa Schultz (New York University Law Review, 2004)
      This Article contends that the current law governing judicial review of agency inaction, though consistent with the prevailing theory of agency legitimacy, is inconsistent with the founding principles of the administrative ...
    • Thomas, Randall S., 1955- (Vanderbilt Law Review, 1993)
      Incumbent management has long enjoyed broad discretion in its use of Rights Plans in proxy contests and joint offers. Legal scholars have accepted the justifications for permitting incumbents such latitude with little ...
    • Maroney, Terry (Judicature, 2021)
      Judicial temperament is something we think all judges must have: We assess it at all critical junctures of a judge’s career. At the same time, judicial temperament is something no one can quite put a finger on. Most often, ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (SMU Law Review, 2014)
      This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say inevitable, abandonment of the prior conviction exception to the rule in Apprendi v. New Jersey. It compiles options states ...
    • Viscusi, W. Kip; Hastie, Reid (DePaul Law Review, 2002)
      Richard Lempert, a Professor of Law and Sociology at the University of Michigan criticized our recent article on judge and jury performance of a punitive damage judgment task, calling it a "failure of a social science case ...
    • O'Connor, Erin O'Hara, 1965- (Chicago Journal of International Law, 2002)
      Recent US court enforcement of foreign forum-selection clauses is durable only to the extent that the clauses make the contracts more valuable to the parties. The clauses can create value by making dispute resolution ...
    • Slobogin, Christopher, 1951- (Northwestern University Law Review, 2003)
      This article addresses the state's police power authority to deprive people of liberty based on predictions of antisocial behavior. Most conspicuously exercised against so-called "sexual predators," this authority purportedly ...
    • King, Nancy J., 1958- (Michigan Law Review, 1996)
      This article examines two aspects of the jury system that have attracted far less attention from scholars than from the popular press: avoidance of jury duty by some citizens, and misconduct while serving by others. ...
    • Viscusi, W. Kip (Journal of Legal Studies, 2001)
      A sample of almost 500 jury-eligible citizens considered a series of experimental situations involving accidents. The juror sample did not properly apply negligence rules, as their errors were particularly great for ...
    • Slobogin, Christopher, 1951- (Ohio State Law Journal, 2009)
      This article, written for a symposium analyzing Justice Ginsburg’s jurisprudence on the 15th anniversary of her tenure on the Supreme Court, is the first sustained look at her views on criminal procedure issues (search and ...