Show simple item record

Induced Litigation

dc.contributor.authorGuthrie, Chris
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Tracey E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-05T23:11:00Z
dc.date.available2013-11-05T23:11:00Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citation98 Nw. U. L. Rev. 545 (2003-2004)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5617
dc.description.abstractIf "justice delayed" is "justice denied,"justice is often denied in American courts. Delay in the courts is a "ceaseless and unremitting problem of modem civil justice" that "has an irreparable effect on both plaintiffs and defendants." To combat this seemingly intractable problem, judges and court administrators routinely clamor for additional judicial resources to enable them to manage their dockets more "effectively and efficiently." By building new courthouses and adding new judgeships, a court should be able to manage its caseload more efficiently. Trial judges should be able to hold motion hearings, host settlement conferences, and conduct trials in a timely fashion; appellate judges should be able to review briefs, hear oral arguments, and issue opinions expeditiously; and the crippling delay that often hobbles litigants and lawyers should give way to the speedy (or at least speedier) resolution of disputes.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (35 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNorthwestern University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudges -- Supply and demand -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCourt administration -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCourt congestion and delay -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleInduced Litigationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record