Show simple item record

How is Constitutional Law Made?

dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Tracey E., 1967-
dc.contributor.authorPushaw, Robert J., Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-19T16:13:21Z
dc.date.available2013-11-19T16:13:21Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citation100 Mich. L. Rev. 1265 (2001-2002)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5684
dc.description.abstractProfessors George and Pushaw review Maxwell L. Stearns’ book, "Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court decision making." In his book, Stearns demonstrates that the U.S. Supreme Court fashions constitutional law through process-based rules of decision such as outcome voting, stare decisis, and justiciability. Employing "social choice" economic theory, Professor Stearns argues that the Court strives to formulate rules that promote rationality and fairness. Perhaps the greatest strength of Stearns’ book is that he presents a grand unified theory of the Court’s rules of constitutional process and the resulting development of doctrine. This strength can also be a weakness, however, because he tends to read precedent and the historical evidence to fit his thesis, even when other explanations may be more persuasive. In this review, Professors George and Pushaw explore two such alternatives, grounded in political science and constitutional theory, and argue that these disciplines are at least as effective as economics in illuminating constitutional lawmakingen_US
dc.format.extent1 document (26 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMichigan Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshStearns, Maxwell L. Constitutional processen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitutional law -- United States -- Decision makingen_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Supreme Courten_US
dc.titleHow is Constitutional Law Made?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1688674


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record