Show simple item record

The Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards

dc.contributor.authorViscusi, W. Kip
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-14T00:14:07Z
dc.date.available2013-12-14T00:14:07Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citation53 Emory L.J. 1405 (2004)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5816
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an analysis of sixty-four punitive damages awards of at least $100 million. Based on an inventory of these cases, there is evidence that these blockbuster awards are highly concentrated geographically, as two states account for twenty-seven of the sixty-four awards. The awards also have been rising substantially over time, with the majority of these blockbuster awards taking place since 1999. An assessment of the current status of the blockbuster punitive damages awards indicates that most of these awards have been appealed, but the reversal of these punitive damages awards is the exception rather than the rule. Many large punitive damages awards are settled without any appeal. The ratio limits outlined in State Farm v. Campbell will affect over ninety percent of the blockbuster awards and over 90% of the damages associated with these awards if a ratio of 1.0 becomes the upper limit on punitive damages.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (53 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEmory Law Journalen_US
dc.subject.lcshExemplary damages -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleThe Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awardsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.publisher.uriwww.law.emory.edu/eljen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=535704


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record