Show simple item record

Race-Based Defenses--The Insights of Traditional Analysis

dc.contributor.authorSlobogin, Christopher, 1951-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-30T21:01:45Z
dc.date.available2013-12-30T21:01:45Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citation54 Ark. L. Rev. 739 (2002)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5847
dc.description.abstractThe determination of whether racialized defenses should be permitted depends upon a number of factors. Professor Alfieri is right to emphasize race-consciousness as an important variable, but wrong to give it dispositive impact. Considerations relating to the substantive law, empirical reality, and fact-finder preconceptions must also be taken into account. This essay attempts to explicate the application of these factors in racialized cases, using language familiar to judges and lawyers. In doing so, it may also increase the likelihood that Alfieri's insights will have real impact on clients, defense attorneys, judges, juries, and the administration of criminal justice as a whole.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (39 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherArkansas Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshDefense (Criminal procedure) -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshRace discrimination -- Law and legislation -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleRace-Based Defenses--The Insights of Traditional Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=304659


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record