Show simple item record

The Origins of Felony Jury Sentencing in the United States

dc.contributor.authorKing, Nancy J., 1958-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-04T16:17:24Z
dc.date.available2014-01-04T16:17:24Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citation78 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 937 (2003)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5855
dc.description.abstractAll of the states admitted to the Union by 1800 eventually abandoned capital punishment for most felonies in favor of discretionary terms of imprisonment. But of these states, only Virginia, Kentucky, and Georgia adopted jury sentencing. In 1786, Pennsylvania became the first state to adopt discretionary terms of hard labor and imprisonment as the primary punishment for felony offenses-delegating to judges the authority to select those terms. In 1796, Virginia opted for jury sentencing, while New York followed Pennsylvania's lead. After 1796, with both Pennsylvania's judge sentencing and Virginia's jury sentencing models to choose from, New Jersey and all of the remaining eastern seaboard states except Georgia, including Maryland and the Carolinas, chose judge sentencing. This Article explores why, despite the Pennsylvania precedent, the lawmakers in Virginia and Kentucky pioneered what was then, and remains today, an unusual delegation of sentencing authority.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (58 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherChicago-Kent Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshSentences (Criminal procedure)en_US
dc.subject.lcshJury -- United States -- Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCriminal law -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleThe Origins of Felony Jury Sentencing in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=436601


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record