Show simple item record

SEC Enforcement Heuristics: An Empirical Inquiry

dc.contributor.authorThomas, Randall S., 1955-
dc.contributor.authorCox, James D., 1943-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-10T21:59:37Z
dc.date.available2014-01-10T21:59:37Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citation53 Duke L.J. 737 (2003-2004)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/5862
dc.description.abstractThis Article examines the overlap between SEC securities enforcement actions and private securities fraud class actions. We begin with an overview of data concerning all SEC enforcement actions from 1997 to 2002. We find that the volume of SEC enforcement proceedings is relatively modest. We next examine the scope of the recently enacted "Fair Fund" provision that authorizes the SEC to designate civil penalties it recovers from defendants to benefit defrauded private investors. We conclude that this provision offers only limited potential relief for private investors. We complete this Part of the Article with an analysis of the serious resource limitations faced by the SEC. The second portion of the Article contains an empirical analysis of the determinants of SEC enforcement actions and the overlap of private fraud suits and SEC enforcement proceedings. Using bivariate analysis, we find that (1) private suits with parallel SEC actions settle for significantly more than private suits without such proceedings; (2) SEC enforcement actions target significantly smaller companies than private actions alone; (3) private cases with parallel SEC actions take substantially less time to settle than other private cases; and (4) private cases with parallel SEC actions have significantly longer class periods than other private actions. Finally, we create a model for estimating damages to compare settlement ratios in cases with parallel SEC actions to those in private actions. We find that one-fourth of all the private class action settlements occurring in suits that yield less than 10 percent of provable losses are settled for less than 2 percent of provable losses, but that there are no private actions with parallel SEC suits with such small settlements. In the final Part of the Article, we conduct a multivariate regression analysis of the determinants of when SEC enforcement actions are filed. We find that the most highly significant determinant of SEC actions is financial distress. Estimated losses do not appear to be a statistically significant factor in the SEC's decision to file these suits.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (45 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDuke Law Journalen_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Securities and Exchange Commission -- Rules and practiceen_US
dc.subject.lcshSecurities fraud -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshGovernmental investigations -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleSEC Enforcement Heuristics: An Empirical Inquiryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=429140


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record