| dc.contributor.author | Gervais, Daniel J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-04T22:34:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-06-04T22:34:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 2011 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/6415 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The proposed amended settlement in the Google Book case has been the focus of numerous comments and critiques. This "perspective" reviews the compatibility of the proposed settlement with the TRIPS Agreement and relevant provisions of the Berne Convention that were incorporated into TRIPS, in particular the no-formality rule, the most-favored nation (MFN) clause, national treatment obligations, and the so-called three-step test. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (11 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Stanford Technology Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Google (Firm) -- Trials, litigation, etc. | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (1994 April 15) | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Copyright -- Electronic information resources | en_US |
| dc.title | The Google Book Settlement and the TRIPS Agreement | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ssrn-uri | http://ssrn.com/abstract=1612358 | |
