Show simple item record

Contrition in the Courtroom: Do Apologies Affect Adjudication?

dc.contributor.authorGuthrie, Chris
dc.contributor.authorRachlinski, Jeffrey John
dc.contributor.authorWistrich, Andrew J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-09T19:00:21Z
dc.date.available2014-06-09T19:00:21Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citation98 Cornell L. Rev. 1189 (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6445
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractApologies usually help to repair social relationships and appease aggrieved parties. Previous research has demonstrated that in legal settings, apologies influence how litigants and juries evaluate both civil and criminal defendants. Judges, however, routinely encounter apologies offered for instrumental reasons, such as to reduce a civil damage award or fine, or to shorten a criminal sentence. Frequent exposure to insincere apologies might make judges suspicious of or impervious to apologies. In a series of experimental studies with judges as research participants, we find that in some criminal settings, apologies can induce judges to be more lenient, but overall, apologizing to a judge is often unhelpful and can even be harmfulen_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (57 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCornell Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshApologizingen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudges -- United States -- Attitudesen_US
dc.subject.lcshLaw -- Psychological aspectsen_US
dc.titleContrition in the Courtroom: Do Apologies Affect Adjudication?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2295033


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record