Show simple item record

Agency Statutory Interpretation and Policymaking Form

dc.contributor.authorStack, Kevin M.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-23T18:52:02Z
dc.date.available2014-07-23T18:52:02Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citation2009 Mich. St. L. Rev. 225 (2009)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6601
dc.description.abstractIn this short symposium contribution, I take up this invitation to examine the relevance of the agency's policymaking form to its approach to statutory interpretation. The core point I wish to advance is a relatively basic one--namely, that an agency's approach to statutory interpretation is in part a function of the policymaking form through which it acts. My strategy is to examine two of the most important policymaking forms--notice-and-comment rulemaking and formal adjudication--and to argue that the considerations that distinguish agency and judicial interpretation have a markedly different place in these two agency policymaking forms. For purposes of exposition, I focus on two dimensions that distinguish agency and judicial statutory interpretation: (1) the role of political influence in general, and presidential direction in particular; and (2) the role of internal management constraints, and considerations of budget in particular.en_US
dc.format.extent1 document (15 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMichigan State Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshAdministrative agencies -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshLaw -- Interpretation and constructionen_US
dc.subject.lcshStatutes -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshPolicy sciencesen_US
dc.titleAgency Statutory Interpretation and Policymaking Formen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record