Show simple item record

The Law and Large Numbers

dc.contributor.authorEdelman, Paul H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-08T14:35:06Z
dc.date.available2014-08-08T14:35:06Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citation19 Const. Comment. 459 (2002)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6637
dc.descriptionBook reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractCan mathematics be used to inform legal analysis? This is not a ridiculous question. Law has certain superficial resemblances to mathematics. One might view the Constitution and various statutes as providing "axioms" for a deductive legal system. From these axioms judges deduce "theorems" consisting of interpretation of these axioms in certain situations. Often these theorems are built on previously "proven" theorems, i.e. earlier decisions of the court. Of course some of the axioms might change, and occasionally a theorem that was once true becomes false; the former is a common feature of mathematics, the latter, though theoretically not possible in mathematics (since a theorem is by definition true) has been known to happen in mathematical practice as well. So maybe mathematics can help law scholars. That is certainly what Michael Meyerson believes. His new book is "premised on the belief that there are many legal ideas that can be explained or clarified by mathematics."en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (19 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherConstitutional Commentaryen_US
dc.subject.lcshMeyerson, Michael. Political Numeracy: Mathematical Perspectives on Our Chaotic Constitutionen_US
dc.subject.lcshMathematics -- Social aspectsen_US
dc.titleThe Law and Large Numbersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record