Show simple item record

The Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awards

dc.contributor.authorViscusi, W. Kip
dc.contributor.authorDel Rossi, Alison F.
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-08T14:43:42Z
dc.date.available2014-08-08T14:43:42Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citation12 Am. Law Econ. Rev. 116 (2010)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6638
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates the determinants of the blockbuster punitive damages awards of at least $100 million. As of the end of 2008, there had been 100 such awards with an average value of $3.0 billion. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in State Farm v. Campbell suggested a single digit upper bound on the punitive damages/compensatory damages ratio, which reduced the annual number of blockbuster awards, the total annual value of blockbuster awards, and the punitive damages/compensatory damages ratio. Applying the 1:1 ratio from Exxon Shipping Co. et al. v. Baker et al. broadly would eliminate most of the blockbuster awards.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (66 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Law and Economics Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshExemplary damages -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleThe Changing Landscape of Blockbuster Punitive Damages Awardsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttp://ssrn.com/abstract=1516007


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record