dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Edward K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-18T14:44:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-18T14:44:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 21 J.L. & Pol'y 541 (2013) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/6897 | |
dc.description | article published in law journal | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This article aims to provide some legal context to the Authorship Attribution
Workshop (“conference”). In particular, I want to offer some pragmatic observations on what courts will likely demand of forensic linguistics experts and tentatively suggest what the field should aspire to in both the short and long run. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (11 pages) | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Journal of Law and Policy | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Forensic linguistics | en_US |
dc.title | Being Pragmatic About Forensic Linguistics | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |