| dc.contributor.author | Ruhl, J.B. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-06T02:03:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-06T02:03:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 33 Hous. L. Rev. 173 (1996) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/7275 | |
| dc.description | article published in law review | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This article examines the field of environmental law as a potential minefield for malpractice claims given its complex and dynamic nature. The article outlines principles for malpractice law applied to environmental law, based on malpractice principles applied in the tax and patent fields. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (44 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Houston Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Environmental law -- United States | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Lawyers -- Malpractice -- United States | en_US |
| dc.title | Malpractice and Environmental Law: Should Environmental Law "Specialists" Be Worried? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
