dc.contributor.author | Viscusi, W. Kip | |
dc.contributor.author | Zeckhauser, Richard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-24T12:17:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-24T12:17:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 33 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13 (2006) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/7403 | |
dc.description | Article published in a journal of theoretical and empirical papers that analyze risk-bearing behavior and decision-making under uncertainty. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A nationally representative sample of respondents estimated their fatality risks from four
types of natural disasters, and indicated whether they favored governmental disaster
relief. For all hazards, including auto accident risks, most respondents assessed their
risks as being below average, with one-third assessing them as average. Individuals from
high-risk states, or with experience with disasters, estimate risks higher, though by less
than reasonable calculations require. Four-fifths of our respondents favor government
relief for disaster victims, but only one-third do for victims in high-risk areas.
Individuals who perceive themselves at higher risk are more supportive of government
assistance. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (49 pages) | en_US |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Natural disasters -- Risk assessment | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Disaster relief -- Public opinion | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Risk perception | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Compassion | en_US |
dc.title | National Survey Evidence on Disasters and Relief: Risk Beliefs, Self-Interest, and Compassion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.publisher.uri | http://www.springer.com/economics/economic+theory/journal/11166 | en_US |