Show simple item record

Res Ipsa Loquitur (Or Why the Other Essays Prove My Point)

dc.contributor.authorSherry, Suzanna
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T17:18:51Z
dc.date.available2016-02-04T17:18:51Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citation66 Vanderbilt Law Review 197 (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/7435
dc.descriptionarticle published in law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractAs all the Roundtable essays note, DaimlerChrysler asks the Supreme Court to decide whether and when the in-­forum activities of a corporate subsidiary should give rise to general personal jurisdiction over the corporate parent. My four co-­contributors provide four wonderfully different perspectives on that question. And what those different perspectives should tell us is􀂳as I argued in my original contribution􀂳that it would be a mistake for the Supreme Court to decide that question in this case.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (6 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherVanderbilt Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudicial power -- United Statesen_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States. Supreme Courten_US
dc.titleRes Ipsa Loquitur (Or Why the Other Essays Prove My Point)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record