| dc.contributor.author | Gervais, Daniel J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-07T20:14:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-07T20:14:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 38 Colum. J.L. & Arts 385 (2015) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/8785 | |
| dc.description | article published in law journal | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The fate of professional creators is a major cultural issue. While specific
copyright rules are obviously contingent and should be adapted to the new realities
of online distribution and easy reuse, professional authorship remains necessary. I
also believe that to be a professional author, creators need time, which, in turn, does
require some form of payment. We need healthy financial flows to allow
professional authors to make a decent, market-based living. This requires a move away from one-size-fits-all copyright and the resulting "tug of norms" that requires a shift of the entire policy package to the benefit of one category of authors and/or users to the detriment of all others. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (14 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Intellectual property | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Internet -- Law and legislation | en_US |
| dc.title | Authors, Online | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
