Show simple item record

The Failure of Breast Cancer Informed Consent Statutes

dc.contributor.authorAnderson-Watts, Rachael
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T19:17:01Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T19:17:01Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation14 Michigan Journal of Gender & law 201 (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/8859
dc.descriptionarticle published in a journal of lawen_US
dc.description.abstractInformed consent is a common law concept rooted in the idea that "[e]very human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body."' Its aim is to ensure that each patient gets the information she needs to meaningfully consent to medical procedures.2 Coming of age in the 1970s alongside other important rights movements, informed consent purported to solve medicine's paternalism: doctors too often dictating treatments rather than discussing options. Combating medical paternalism seems a worthwhile goal, given abuses in the past century,3 but moreover to improve everyday physician-patient encounters. Nevertheless, a lofty goal does not dictate a positive outcome, and some decades later, the law of informed consent is failing.'en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (23 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMichigan Journal of Gender & Lawen_US
dc.subjectinformed consenten_US
dc.subjectethics in health careen_US
dc.subject.lcshMedical laws and legislationen_US
dc.subject.lcshLawen_US
dc.titleThe Failure of Breast Cancer Informed Consent Statutesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record