Show simple item record

Judicial Entrepreneurs on the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Citation Analysis of Judicial Influence

dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Tracey E.
dc.contributor.authorBerger, Jeffrey A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T21:32:23Z
dc.date.available2018-06-05T21:32:23Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/8870
dc.descriptiona working paper, originally presented at a symposium.en_US
dc.description.abstractFederal courts of appeals are constrained by the power and preferences of the Supreme Court. The principal-agent model reveals that circuit judges gain power largely by avoiding review. We consider, however, whether circuit judges may adopt a strategy aimed at attracting a justice's attention rather than eluding it. In the present paper, we find that Supreme Court justices regularly cite circuit court opinions, particularly those decided within the last ten years and authored by judges from the same party. The Court's practice of acknowledging lower court rulings emphasizes the power of intermediate appellate courts in a hierarchical, common-law judicial system.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (23 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudgesen_US
dc.subject.lcshLawen_US
dc.titleJudicial Entrepreneurs on the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Citation Analysis of Judicial Influenceen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ssrn-urihttps://ssrn.com/abstract=789544


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record