Show simple item record

Medical Marijuana and the Political Safeguards of Federalism

dc.contributor.authorMikos, Robert A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-06T17:32:18Z
dc.date.available2018-11-06T17:32:18Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citation89 Denver University Law Review 997 (2012)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/9332
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractMedical marijuana has emerged as one of the key federalism battlegrounds of the last two decades. Since 1996, sixteen states have passed new laws legalizing the drug for certain medical purposes.' All the while, the federal government has remained committed to zero-tolerance, prohibiting the possession, cultivation, and distribution of marijuana for any purpose.2 The federal government's uncompromising stance against medical marijuana seemingly exposes the states' vulnerability to the whims of the national political process, and it has inspired calls for the courts to step in and protect state experimentation from this and other instances of arguable congressional over-reaching.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (15 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDenver University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectmedical marijuanaen_US
dc.subjectfederalismen_US
dc.subject.lcshlawen_US
dc.subject.lcshcriminal lawen_US
dc.titleMedical Marijuana and the Political Safeguards of Federalismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record