Show simple item record

Desire, Knowledge, and the Origins of Self-Consciousness: A Theological Account in Conversation with Augustine, Aquinas, and Freud

dc.creatorEllis, Daryl Tad
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-23T15:46:36Z
dc.date.available2018-11-21
dc.date.issued2016-11-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/etd-11172016-132059
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/14580
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation proposes a novel way of reconceptualizing the nature, origins, and theological significance of egoic self-consciousness that successfully eludes the deeply-rooted impulse to ground the “self” circularly through an act of epistemic reflection (e.g. Descartes) or a priori presupposition (e.g. Kant). It does so by constructively resourcing two intellectual traditions: (1) the Augustinian/Thomist synthesis and particularly its meta-physical framework for specifying the exitus-reditus structure of creation, the human soul and the interrelated diversity of its vertically layered powers of apprehension (viz. knowledge) and appetite (viz. desire), and the varieties of intensive and extroverted unity that characterize human existence as deficient similitudes of God’s simplicity and (2) the metapsychology of Sigmund Freud and particularly his discovery of a human capacity through which we unconsciously identify with certain sense-perceptions such that they are perceived in terms of a pre-reflective wholeness that eludes the subject/object division (e.g. “I am the breast”). The resulting argument is that egoic self-consciousness emerges as an act of identification that slowly condenses around “our” bodies following the painful disruption of our archaic identification with the maternal body. For as long as this act endures it produces the pre-reflective wholeness that we later signify reflectively and epistemically: “I am this body.” Furthermore, this theorization can be synthesized with an Augustinian/Thomist anthropology as a distinct identifying “layer” of the soul—complete with an apprehensive and appetitive power—that stands “between” the sensitive and intellectual layers of the soul. The resulting anthropology yields a maximally orderly ac-count of the developmental, created, and teleological relation between self-consciousness, the powers of the soul, and the varieties of unity in human existence. When situated in this manner, self-consciousness can be understood alongside three other analogous types of intensive unity—the soul, self-knowledge, and the vertical alignment of our appetites—all of which are deficiently similar to the intelligible whence and whither of all creation: the absolute intensive simplicity of the divine essence.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.subjectSigmund Freud
dc.subjectAugustine of Hippo
dc.subjectThomas Aquinas
dc.subjectknowledge
dc.subjectdesire
dc.subjectself-consciousness
dc.subjecttheological anthropology
dc.titleDesire, Knowledge, and the Origins of Self-Consciousness: A Theological Account in Conversation with Augustine, Aquinas, and Freud
dc.typedissertation
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBruce Morrill
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBruce L. McCormack
dc.contributor.committeeMemberJ. Patout Burns
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEllen T. Armour
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.namePHD
thesis.degree.leveldissertation
thesis.degree.disciplineReligion
thesis.degree.grantorVanderbilt University
local.embargo.terms2018-11-21
local.embargo.lift2018-11-21
dc.contributor.committeeChairPaul J. DeHart


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record