Show simple item record

Association between financial links to indoor tanning industry and conclusions of published studies on indoor tanning: systematic review

dc.contributor.authorAdekunle, Lola
dc.contributor.authorChen, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorMorrison, Lily
dc.contributor.authorHalley, Meghan
dc.contributor.authorEng, Victor
dc.contributor.authorHendlin, Yogi
dc.contributor.authorWehner, Mackenzie R.
dc.contributor.authorChren, Mary-Margaret
dc.contributor.authorLinos, Eleni
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T03:44:50Z
dc.date.available2020-09-24T03:44:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-05
dc.identifier.citationBMJ 2020;368:m7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1756-1833
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/16150
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE To assess whether an association exists between financial links to the indoor tanning industry and conclusions of indoor tanning literature. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCE PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, up to 15 February 2019. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA Articles discussing indoor tanning and health were eligible for inclusion, with no article type restrictions (original research, systematic reviews, review articles, case reports, editorials, commentaries, and letters were all eligible). Basic science studies, articles describing only indoor tanning prevalence, non-English articles, and articles without full text available were excluded. RESULTS 691 articles were included in analysis, including empiric articles (eg, original articles or systematic reviews) (357/691; 51.7%) and non-empiric articles letters (eg, commentaries, letters, or editorials) (334/691; 48.3%). Overall, 7.2% (50/691) of articles had financial links to the indoor tanning industry; 10.7% (74/691) articles favored indoor tanning, 3.9% (27/691) were neutral, and 85.4% (590/691) were critical of indoor tanning. Among the articles without industry funding, 4.4% (27/620) favored indoor tanning, 3.5% (22/620) were neutral, and 92.1% (571/620) were critical of indoor tanning. Among the articles with financial links to the indoor tanning industry, 78% (39/50) favored indoor tanning, 10% (5/50) were neutral, and 12% (6/50) were critical of indoor tanning. Support from the indoor tanning industry was significantly associated with favoring indoor tanning (risk ratio 14.3, 95% confidence interval 10.0 to 20.4). CONCLUSIONS Although most articles in the indoor tanning literature are independent of industry funding, articles with financial links to the indoor tanning industry are more likely to favor indoor tanning. Public health practitioners and researchers need to be aware of and account for industry funding when interpreting the evidence related to indoor tanning.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEL is supported by the NIH (grants DP2CA225433 and K24AR075060). MH is supported by an NCI/NIH Re-entry Supplement (grant DP2CA225433-02). MRW was supported by NIAMS/NIH Dermatology Research Training grant T32 AR7465 (PI, Sarah E Millar). MC is supported by the NIH (grant R01AR073001). There was no specific funding for the study.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMJ-British Medical Journalen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
dc.source.urihttps://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m7
dc.titleAssociation between financial links to indoor tanning industry and conclusions of published studies on indoor tanning: systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.m7


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record