| dc.contributor.author | Slobogin, Christopher, 1951- | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-12-09T17:59:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-12-09T17:59:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1981 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 18 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 387 (1981) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/5767 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Professor Slobogin examines recent Supreme Court decisions involving standing to challenge search and seizure violations, and argues that the Court's commitment to a "totality of the circumstances" approach has permitted erosion of fourth amendment protections. After concluding that these decisions provide little guidance to lower courts, Professor Slobogin offers a set of principles which will aid in analyzing the Court's direction. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 document (33 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | American Criminal Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Searches and seizures -- United States | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | United States. Constitution. 4th Amendment | en_US |
| dc.title | Capacity to Contest a Search and Seizure: the Passing of Old Rules and Some Suggestions for New Ones | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
