| dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Edward K. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-05T21:27:21Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-05T21:27:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 48 Seton Hall Law Review 559 (2018) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1803/9299 | |
| dc.description | A tribute to Prof. Michael Risinger given at a symposium in honor of Professor Risinger. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Michael Risinger's scholarship has had a profound impact on our field. And while his work has run the gamut in evidence law, I think it is clear that Michael's true love has always been expert evidence, and more specifically, forensics. So let me take a moment to revisit "an oldie but a goodie": his 1989 article entitled Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification "Expertise," published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and co-authored with Mark Denbeaux and Michael Saks.' For those of you who have not read the article, you should. For those of you who read it long ago, I think you will find it stands the test of time. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1 PDF (5 pages) | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Seton Hall Law Review | en_US |
| dc.subject | evidence | en_US |
| dc.subject | expert evidence | en_US |
| dc.subject | forensics | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | law | en_US |
| dc.subject.lcsh | evidence | en_US |
| dc.title | Forensics, , Chicken Soup, and Meteorites: A Tribute to Michael Risinger | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
