Show simple item record

Debating the Past's Authority in Alabama

dc.contributor.authorMayeux, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T22:23:33Z
dc.date.available2018-11-05T22:23:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citation70 Stanford Law Review 1645 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/9317
dc.descriptionarticle published in a law reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractIn 2015, the city council of Birmingham, Alabama enacted an ordinance establishing a local minimum wage of $10.10 an hour-a significant raise for the city's low-income workers from the federal floor of $7.25. The ordinance proved short-lived. Within months, the Alabama legislature had passed and the governor signed statewide preemption legislation nullifying all local wage regulations. Marnika Lewis, a twenty-three-year-old mother and employee of the Moe's Southwest Grill burrito chain, is among several plaintiffs challenging the Alabama preemption statute, HB 174, as unconstitutional and racially discriminatory. "[T]he legislature and the governor," Lewis complains, have "stolen my raise." Lewis's legal claims rest upon a deeper set of claims about Alabama historyen_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (9 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherStanford Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectlabor lawen_US
dc.subjectdiscriminationen_US
dc.subject.lcshlawen_US
dc.subject.lcshcivil rightsen_US
dc.titleDebating the Past's Authority in Alabamaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record