• About
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DiscoverArchive Home
    • Law School
    • Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Works
    • View Item
    •   DiscoverArchive Home
    • Law School
    • Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    "The Threes": Re-Imagining Supreme Court Decisionmaking

    Guthrie, Chris, 1967-
    George, Tracey E., 1967-
    : http://hdl.handle.net/1803/5630
    : 2008

    Abstract

    In this Essay--the first in a series of essays designed to reimagine the Supreme Court--we argue that Congress should authorize the Court to adopt, in whole or part, panel decision making... With respect to the prospect of different Court outcomes, we demonstrate empirically in this Essay that the vast majority of cases decided during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries--including "Grutter", "Roe", and "Bush v. Gore" --would have come out the same way if the Court had decided them in panels rather than as a full Court.
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    Icon
    Name:
    The Threes.pdf
    Size:
    2.175Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Description:
    published article in law review
    View/Open

    This item appears in the following collection(s):

    • Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Works

    Browse

    All of DiscoverArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login
    Give Now
    Support the Jean and Alexander Heard Library

    Gifts to the Library support the learning and research needs of the entire Vanderbilt community.

    Learn More
    Follow Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS
    • Jean and Alexander Heard Library
    • 419 21st Avenue South
    • Nashville, TN 37203
    • 615-322-7100
    • Hours
    • About
    • Employment
    • Staff
    • Contact