Show simple item record

Silencing Nullification Advocacy Inside the Jury Room and Outside the Courtroom

dc.contributor.authorKing, Nancy J., 1958-
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-24T20:42:58Z
dc.date.available2014-06-24T20:42:58Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citation65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 433 (1998)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1803/6502
dc.description.abstractJurors in criminal cases occasionally "nullify" the law by acquitting defendants who they believe are guilty according to the instructions given to them in court. American juries have exercised this unreviewable nullification power to acquit defendants who face sentences that jurors view as too harsh, who have been subjected to what jurors consider to be unconscionable governmental action, who have engaged in conduct that jurors do not believe is culpable, or who have harmed victims whom jurors consider unworthy of protection. Recent reports suggest jurors today are balking in trials in which a conviction could trigger a "three strikes" or other mandatory sentence, and in "assisted suicide," drug possession, and firearms cases. Race-based nullification is also a topic of current interest.en_US
dc.format.extent1 PDF (69 pages)en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Law Reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshJury nullification -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleSilencing Nullification Advocacy Inside the Jury Room and Outside the Courtroomen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record